Miyake Fuyu, Suga Rika, Akiyama Takahiro, Namba Fumihiko
Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Department of Clinical Engineering, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 May;28(5):458-462. doi: 10.1111/pan.13366. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
Neonates, particularly premature babies, are often managed with endotracheal intubation and subsequent mechanical ventilation to maintain adequate pulmonary gas exchange. There is no consensus on the standard length of endotracheal tube. Although a short tube reduces resistance and respiratory dead space, it is believed to increase the risk of accidental extubation. There are not entirely coherent data regarding the effect of endotracheal tube length on work of breathing in infants.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of neonatal endotracheal tube diameter and length on the work of breathing using an infant in vitro lung model.
We assessed the work of breathing index and mechanical ventilation settings with various endotracheal tube diameters and lengths using the JTR100 in vitro infant lung model. The basic parameters of the model were breathing frequency of 20 per minutes, inspiratory-expiratory ratio of 1:3, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH O. In addition, the diaphragm driving pressure to maintain the set tidal volume was measured as the work of breathing index. The JTR100 was connected to the Babylog 8000plus through the endotracheal tube. Finally, we monitored the peak inspiratory pressure generated during assist-control volume guarantee mode with a targeted tidal volume of 10-30 mL.
The diaphragm driving pressure using a 2.0-mm inner diameter tube was twice as high as that using a 4.0-mm inner diameter tube. To maintain the targeted tidal volume, a shorter tube reduced both the diaphragm driving pressure and ventilator-generated peak inspiratory pressure. The difference in the generated peak inspiratory pressure between the shortest and longest tubes was 5 cmH O.
In our infant lung model, a shorter tube resulted in a lower work of breathing and lower ventilator-generated peak inspiratory pressure.
新生儿,尤其是早产儿,常需进行气管插管及随后的机械通气以维持充分的肺气体交换。气管导管的标准长度尚无共识。尽管短导管可降低阻力和呼吸死腔,但据信会增加意外拔管的风险。关于气管导管长度对婴儿呼吸功的影响,数据并不完全一致。
本研究旨在使用婴儿体外肺模型评估新生儿气管导管直径和长度对呼吸功的影响。
我们使用JTR100体外婴儿肺模型评估了不同气管导管直径和长度下的呼吸功指数及机械通气设置。模型的基本参数为呼吸频率每分钟20次、吸呼比1:3以及呼气末正压5cmH₂O。此外,测量维持设定潮气量所需的膈肌驱动压力作为呼吸功指数。JTR100通过气管导管与Babylog 8000plus相连。最后,我们在目标潮气量为10 - 30mL的辅助控制容量保证模式下监测产生的吸气峰压。
使用内径2.0mm导管时的膈肌驱动压力是使用内径4.0mm导管时的两倍。为维持目标潮气量,较短的导管可降低膈肌驱动压力和呼吸机产生的吸气峰压。最短和最长导管产生的吸气峰压差值为5cmH₂O。
在我们的婴儿肺模型中,较短的导管导致较低的呼吸功和较低的呼吸机产生的吸气峰压。