Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Dr, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130. Email:
Chronic Disease Prevention Section, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 12;15:E92. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170482.
Research shows that training can improve skills needed for evidence-based decision making, but less is known about instituting organizational supports to build capacity for evidence-based chronic disease prevention.
The objectives of this case study were to assess facilitators and challenges of applying management practices to support evidence-based decision making in chronic disease prevention programs in the public health system in Georgia through key informant interviews and quantitatively test for changes in perceived management practices and skills through a pre-post survey.
Leadership of the chronic disease prevention section hosted a multiday training, provided regular supplemental training, restructured the section and staff meetings, led and oversaw technical assistance with partners, instituted transparent performance-based contracting, and made other changes. A 65-item online survey measured perceived importance of skills and the availability of skilled staff, organizational supports, and use of research evidence at baseline (2014) and in 2016 (after training). A structured interview guide asked about management practices, context, internal and external facilitators and barriers, and recommendations.
CAPACITY-BUILDING ACTIVITIES AND SURVEY FINDINGS: Seventy-four staff members and partners completed both surveys (70.5% response). Eleven participants also completed a 1-hour telephone interview. Interview participants deemed leadership support and implementation of multiple concurrent management practices key facilitators to increase capacity. Main challenges included competing priorities, lack of political will, and receipt of requests counter to evidence-based approaches. At posttest, health department staff had significantly reduced gaps in skills overall (10-item sum) and in 4 of 10 individual skills, and increased use of research evidence to justify interventions. Use of research evidence for evaluation, but not skills, increased among partners.
The commitment of leaders with authority to establish multiple management practices to help staff members learn and apply evidence-based decision-making processes is key to increased use of evidence-based chronic disease prevention to improve population health.
研究表明,培训可以提高循证决策所需的技能,但对于建立组织支持以建立循证慢性病预防能力知之甚少。
本案例研究的目的是通过关键知情人访谈评估通过管理实践支持公共卫生系统中慢性病预防计划循证决策的应用的促进因素和挑战,并通过前后调查定量测试对感知管理实践和技能的变化。
慢性病预防科的领导层举办了为期多天的培训,提供定期补充培训,重组科室和员工会议,领导并监督与合作伙伴的技术援助,实施透明的基于绩效的合同,并进行了其他更改。一项 65 项在线调查衡量了技能的重要性以及熟练员工、组织支持和在基线(2014 年)和 2016 年(培训后)使用研究证据的情况。一份结构化的访谈指南询问了管理实践、背景、内部和外部促进因素和障碍以及建议。
74 名员工和合作伙伴完成了两次调查(70.5%的回应率)。11 名参与者还完成了 1 小时的电话访谈。访谈参与者认为领导层的支持和同时实施多项管理实践是增加能力的关键促进因素。主要挑战包括优先事项冲突、缺乏政治意愿以及收到与循证方法相悖的请求。在测试后,卫生部门工作人员在整体技能(10 项总和)和 10 项个别技能中的 4 项方面明显缩小了差距,并增加了使用研究证据来证明干预措施的合理性。合作伙伴对研究证据的使用(用于评估,但不是技能)有所增加。
具有权威的领导者建立多项管理实践以帮助员工学习和应用循证决策过程的承诺是增加循证慢性病预防以改善人口健康的关键。