7548 Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
National Association of Chronic Disease Directors, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(6):710-718. doi: 10.1177/0033354920984159. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Evidence-based decision making (EBDM) allows public health practitioners to implement effective programs and policies fitting the preferences of their communities. To engage in EBDM, practitioners must have skills themselves, their agencies must engage in administrative evidence-based practices (A-EBPs), and leaders must encourage the use of EBDM. We conducted this longitudinal study to quantify perceptions of individual EBDM skills and A-EBPs, as well as the longitudinal associations between the 2.
An online survey completed among US state health department practitioners in 2016 and 2018 assessed perceptions of respondents' skills in EBDM and A-EBPs. We used χ tests, tests, and linear regressions to quantify changes over time, differences by demographic characteristics, and longitudinal associations between individual skills and A-EBPs among respondents who completed both surveys (N = 336).
Means of most individual EBDM skills and A-EBPs did not change significantly from 2016 to 2018. We found significant positive associations between changes in A-EBPs and changes in EBDM skill gaps: for example, a 1-point increase in the relationships and partnerships score was associated with a narrowing of the EBDM skill gap (β estimate = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.61). At both time points, perceived skills and A-EBPs related to financial practices were low.
Findings from this study can guide the development and dissemination of initiatives designed to simultaneously improve individual and organizational capacity for EBDM in public health settings. Future studies should focus on types of strategies most effective to build capacity in particular types of agencies and practitioners, to ultimately improve public health practice.
循证决策(EBDM)使公共卫生从业人员能够实施符合其社区偏好的有效计划和政策。要进行 EBDM,从业人员本身必须具备技能,其机构必须参与行政循证实践(A-EBPs),领导者必须鼓励使用 EBDM。我们进行了这项纵向研究,以量化个人 EBDM 技能和 A-EBPs 的认知,以及这两者之间的纵向关联。
2016 年和 2018 年,我们通过在线调查,对美国州卫生部门从业人员进行了调查,评估了受访者对 EBDM 和 A-EBPs 技能的认知。我们使用 χ2 检验、t 检验和线性回归来量化随时间的变化、人口统计学特征的差异,以及在完成两次调查的受访者中(n=336)个人技能和 A-EBPs 之间的纵向关联。
大多数个人 EBDM 技能和 A-EBPs 的平均值在 2016 年至 2018 年期间没有显著变化。我们发现 A-EBPs 的变化与 EBDM 技能差距的变化之间存在显著的正相关:例如,关系和伙伴关系评分提高 1 分与 EBDM 技能差距缩小相关(β估计值=0.38;95%CI,0.15-0.61)。在两个时间点,财务实践相关的感知技能和 A-EBPs 都较低。
本研究的结果可以指导旨在同时提高公共卫生环境中个人和组织 EBDM 能力的举措的制定和传播。未来的研究应侧重于确定最有效的策略类型,以在特定类型的机构和从业人员中建立能力,最终改善公共卫生实践。