Fantino Marc, Fantino Agnès, Matray Marie, Mistretta Frédéric
CreaBio-Rhône-Alpes Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Montgelas, 9 Avenue Professeur Fleming, F-69700 Givors, France.
CreaBio-Rhône-Alpes Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Montgelas, 9 Avenue Professeur Fleming, F-69700 Givors, France.
Appetite. 2018 Oct 1;129:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.036. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
The usefulness of replacement of caloric sugars by low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) for weight management has been questioned on the grounds that the uncoupling of LCS sweet taste and dietary energy may confuse physiological mechanisms, leading potentially to higher energy and sugar intake. The aim of the present study was to determine whether LCS beverages compared to water, when consumed with meals, differ in their effects on energy and food intake in acute trials and after long-term habituation. Ad libitum food intake of 166 (80 women; 86 men) healthy non-obese adults (BMI between 19 and 28 kg/m), infrequent consumers of LCS was measured in four 2-consecutive-day testing sessions (Day 1 in the laboratory, Day 2 free-living). During the first 3 sessions, held one-week apart, participants were required to drink either water or commercial non-carbonated LCS lemonade (330 ml) with their main meals (randomised cross-over design). On Day 1, motivational ratings were obtained using visual analogue scales and ad libitum food intakes (amounts and types of foods selected) were measured using the plate waste method. On Day 2, participants reported their ad libitum intakes using a food diary. After Session 3, participants were randomly assigned to the LCS habituation group or to the water control group. The habituation (660 ml LCS lemonade daily vs 660 ml water) lasted 5 weeks. The fourth and final test session measured food intakes and motivational ratings after habituation. Water and LCS beverage did not differ in their effects on total energy intake, macronutrient intakes or the selection of sweet foods and on motivational ratings. Similar results were obtained in both LCS-naïve and LCS-habituated individuals.
低热量甜味剂(LCS)替代热量糖对体重管理的有效性受到了质疑,理由是LCS的甜味与膳食能量脱钩可能会扰乱生理机制,潜在地导致更高的能量和糖摄入量。本研究的目的是确定与水相比,LCS饮料在与餐食一起饮用时,在急性试验和长期习惯化后对能量和食物摄入量的影响是否存在差异。在四个连续两天的测试环节(第1天在实验室,第2天自由生活)中,测量了166名(80名女性;86名男性)健康非肥胖成年人(BMI在19至28kg/m之间)的随意食物摄入量,这些人很少食用LCS。在前三个相隔一周进行的环节中,参与者被要求在主餐时饮用要么水要么市售非碳酸LCS柠檬水(330毫升)(随机交叉设计)。在第1天,使用视觉模拟量表获得动机评分,并使用餐盘浪费法测量随意食物摄入量(所选食物的数量和类型)。在第2天,参与者使用食物日记报告他们的随意摄入量。在第3个环节之后,参与者被随机分配到LCS习惯化组或水对照组。习惯化(每天660毫升LCS柠檬水与660毫升水)持续5周。第四个也是最后一个测试环节测量了习惯化后的食物摄入量和动机评分。水和LCS饮料在对总能量摄入、宏量营养素摄入、甜食选择以及动机评分的影响方面没有差异。在从未接触过LCS的人和习惯了LCS的个体中都得到了类似的结果。