CreaBio-Rhône-Alpes Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Montgelas, 9 Avenue Professeur Fleming, F-69700 Givors, France.
CreaBio-Rhône-Alpes Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Montgelas, 9 Avenue Professeur Fleming, F-69700 Givors, France.
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:557-565. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
The usefulness of replacement of caloric sugars by low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) for weight management has been questioned on the grounds that the uncoupling of LCS sweet taste and dietary energy may confuse physiological mechanisms, leading potentially to higher energy and sugar intake. The aim of the present study was to determine whether LCS beverages compared to water, when consumed with meals, differ in their effects on energy and food intake in acute trials and after long-term habituation. Ad libitum food intake of 166 (80 women; 86 men) healthy non-obese adults (BMI between 19 and 28 kg/m2), infrequent consumers of LCS was measured in four 2-consecutive-day testing sessions (Day 1 in the laboratory, Day 2 free-living). During the first 3 sessions, held one-week apart, participants were required to drink either water or commercial non-carbonated LCS lemonade (330 ml) with their main meals (randomised cross-over design). On Day 1, motivational ratings were obtained using visual analogue scales and ad libitum food intakes (amounts and types of foods selected) were measured using the plate waste method. On Day 2, participants reported their ad libitum intakes using a food diary. After Session 3, participants were randomly assigned to the LCS habituation group or to the water control group. The habituation (660 ml LCS lemonade daily vs 660 ml water) lasted 5 weeks. The fourth and final test session measured food intakes and motivational ratings after habituation. Water and LCS beverage did not differ in their effects on total energy intake, macronutrient intakes or the selection of sweet foods and on motivational ratings. Similar results were obtained in both LCS-naïve and LCS-habituated individuals.
低热量甜味剂(LCS)替代热量糖在体重管理中的有效性受到质疑,其理由是 LCS 的甜味与膳食能量的解偶联可能会混淆生理机制,从而导致更高的能量和糖摄入。本研究旨在确定与水相比,在进餐时饮用 LCS 饮料是否会在急性试验和长期习惯形成后对能量和食物摄入产生不同的影响。在四个连续两天的测试会议(实验室的第 1 天,第 2 天自由生活)中,测量了 166 名(80 名女性;86 名男性)健康非肥胖成年人(BMI 在 19 至 28kg/m2 之间)的随意食物摄入量,他们不常食用 LCS。在相隔一周的前 3 次会议中,要求参与者用主餐(随机交叉设计)饮用水或商业非碳酸 LCS 柠檬水(330ml)。在第 1 天,使用视觉模拟量表获得动机评分,并使用餐盘浪费法测量随意食物摄入量(选择的食物量和类型)。在第 2 天,参与者使用食物日记报告他们的随意摄入量。在第 3 次会议后,参与者被随机分配到 LCS 习惯形成组或水对照组。习惯形成(每天 660ml LCS 柠檬水与 660ml 水)持续 5 周。第四次也是最后一次测试会议测量了习惯形成后的食物摄入量和动机评分。水和 LCS 饮料在总能量摄入、宏量营养素摄入或甜食选择以及动机评分方面没有差异。在 LCS 新手和 LCS 习惯形成者中都获得了相似的结果。