Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and McGRADE Center, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Cra. 51D #62-29, Medellin, 050001, Colombia.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 13;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0330-0.
Practice guidelines require a substantial investment of resources and time, often taking between 1 and 3 years from conceptualisation to publication. However, urgent situations require the development of recommendations in a shorter timeframe. In this third and final article in the series exploring challenges and solutions in developing rapid guidelines (RGs), we propose guiding principles for the development of RGs.
We utilised the Guideline International Network-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) as a starting point for elements to consider during RG development. We built on those elements using the findings from a systematic review of guideline manuals, a survey of international organisations conducting RGs, and interviews of guideline developers within WHO. We reviewed initial findings and developed an intermediate list of elements, as well as narrative guidance. We then invited experts to validate the intermediate list, reviewing for placement, brevity and redundancy. We used this iterative process and group consensus to determine the final elements for RG development guidance.
Our work identified 21 principles within the topics of the Guideline International Network-McMaster GDC to guide the planning and development of RGs. Principles fell within 15 of the 18 checklist topics, highlighting strategies to streamline and expedite the guideline development process.
We defined principles to guide the development of RGs, while maintaining a standardised, rigorous and transparent process. These principles will serve as guidance for guideline developers responding to urgent situations such as public health urgencies. Integration of these principles within currently disseminated guideline development standards will facilitate the use of those tools in situations necessitating RG recommendations.
实践指南的制定需要大量的资源和时间投入,从概念化到发布通常需要 1 到 3 年的时间。然而,紧急情况需要在更短的时间内制定建议。在本系列探讨制定快速指南(RGs)面临的挑战和解决方案的第三篇也是最后一篇文章中,我们提出了制定 RGs 的指导原则。
我们利用指南国际网络-麦克马斯特指南制定核对表(GDC)作为制定 RG 时需要考虑的要素的起点。我们利用从指南手册系统评价、对进行 RGs 的国际组织的调查以及世卫组织内指南制定者的访谈中获得的发现,对这些要素进行了扩展。我们审查了初步结果,并制定了一份要素的中间清单以及叙述性指南。然后,我们邀请专家对中间清单进行验证,审查其位置、简洁性和重复性。我们使用这个迭代过程和小组共识来确定 RG 开发指导的最终要素。
我们的工作确定了指南国际网络-麦克马斯特 GDC 主题内的 21 条原则,以指导 RGs 的规划和制定。这些原则属于 18 个核对表主题中的 15 个,突出了简化和加快指南制定过程的策略。
我们定义了指导 RGs 制定的原则,同时保持了标准化、严格和透明的过程。这些原则将为应对公共卫生紧急情况等紧急情况的指南制定者提供指导。将这些原则纳入目前传播的指南制定标准中,将有助于在需要 RG 建议的情况下使用这些工具。