Postgraduate Prosthodontics Registrar, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Associate Professor and Program Director, Postgraduate Prosthodontics, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):151-155. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Techniques that allow angulation correction for screw-retained implant-supported restorations are now available. However, whether angulation correction built into the head of the implant affects abutment screw loosening is unclear.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess abutment screw loosening in angulation-correcting implants and straight implants subjected to simulated nonaxial occlusal loading.
Seven external connection 12-degree angulation-correcting implants and 7 straight implants were embedded in an acrylic resin housing, and titanium abutments were secured with titanium screws tightened to 32 Ncm. Each specimen was secured in a tooth wear machine and subjected to 1 000 000 cycles of 50-N nonaxial load to simulate 1 year of clinical service. The mean abutment screw removal torque values were calculated, and the association between number of cycles and the abutment screw removal torque was analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model and statistical software (α=.05) RESULTS: The mean abutment screw torque loss was 59.8% for the angulation-correcting implant group and 68.7% for the straight implant group. A statistically significantly greater mean abutment screw removal torque was recorded in the angulation-correcting implant group compared with the straight implant group after 1 000 000 cycles (P=.019).
A significant loss of abutment screw torque was found in both implant groups with increased cycles of occlusal loading. The angulation-correcting implants resisted screw loosening significantly more than the straight implants because of the reduced angle of abutment screw loading.
现在有一些技术可以纠正螺钉固位种植体支持修复体的角度。然而,植入物头部内置的角度校正是否会影响基台螺钉松动尚不清楚。
本体外研究的目的是评估在模拟非轴向咬合负荷下,角度校正种植体和直种植体的基台螺钉松动情况。
将 7 个外连接 12 度角度校正种植体和 7 个直种植体嵌入丙烯酸树脂外壳中,并用钛基台和钛螺丝固定,拧紧至 32 Ncm。每个标本都固定在牙齿磨损机上,承受 50-N 的非轴向负荷 100 万次,模拟 1 年的临床服务。计算平均基台螺钉拔出扭矩值,并使用线性混合效应模型和统计软件(α=.05)分析循环次数与基台螺钉拔出扭矩之间的关系。
角度校正种植体组的平均基台螺钉扭矩损失为 59.8%,直种植体组为 68.7%。在 100 万次循环后,角度校正种植体组的平均基台螺钉拔出扭矩明显高于直种植体组(P=.019)。
随着咬合负荷循环次数的增加,两组种植体的基台螺钉扭矩均明显下降。由于基台螺钉负荷角度减小,角度校正种植体对螺钉松动的抵抗力明显大于直种植体。