• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可弯曲种植体系统中不同种植体倾斜度和基台类型的生物力学比较。

Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system.

作者信息

Bilgi-Ozyetim Esra, Dinçer Gökçen, Sulaiman Ammar, Dayan Süleyman Çağatay, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz Sevcan, Geçkili Onur

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06610-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-06610-1
PMID:40684102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12276677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the stress distribution in peri-implant bone, implant surfaces, and within the framework material under vertical and oblique loads, considering various angulations and abutment types of bendable one-piece implants in the All-on-4 concept.

METHODS

A three-dimensional model of an edentulous mandible was constructed. Six different configurations were modeled according to prosthesis connection type and inclination of the posterior implants based on the All-on-4 protocol. Four one-piece implants were placed in each model and a cobalt-chromium frameworks with 14 mm cantilever lengths were designed. Under vertical and oblique loading conditions, maximum principal stress and minimum principal stress values were obtained for cortical and trabecular bone and von Mises stress values were calculated for implants and frameworks.

RESULTS

Implant angulation, connection type, and loading conditions affected stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and frameworks. Higher stress values were observed in posterior implants with increased angulation. Screw-retained models demonstrated greater stress values compared to cement-retained ones under both loading conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

For optimal stress distribution in peri-implant bone and frameworks, cement-retained prosthesis may be preferred, especially in cases with increased implant angulation in one-piece bendable systems. Additionally, careful consideration of posterior implant angulation and loading conditions is crucial to minimize the excessive stress and to enhance long-term stability.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在全口4颗种植体理念中,考虑可弯曲一体式种植体的各种角度和基台类型,在垂直和斜向载荷下种植体周围骨组织、种植体表面以及支架材料内的应力分布情况。

方法

构建无牙下颌骨的三维模型。根据全口4颗种植体方案,依据修复体连接类型和后牙种植体的倾斜度对六种不同构型进行建模。每个模型植入4颗一体式种植体,并设计悬臂长度为14毫米的钴铬合金支架。在垂直和斜向加载条件下,获取皮质骨和松质骨的最大主应力和最小主应力值,并计算种植体和支架的冯·米塞斯应力值。

结果

种植体角度、连接类型和加载条件会影响种植体周围骨组织、种植体及支架的应力分布。角度增加时,后牙种植体的应力值更高。在两种加载条件下,螺丝固位模型的应力值均高于粘结固位模型。

结论

为使种植体周围骨组织和支架达到最佳应力分布,粘结固位修复体可能更为可取,尤其是在一体式可弯曲系统中种植体角度增加的情况下。此外,仔细考虑后牙种植体角度和加载条件对于最小化过大应力及提高长期稳定性至关重要。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/c4604be7b117/12903_2025_6610_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/fb618d70e8ec/12903_2025_6610_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/7264e9fb35b1/12903_2025_6610_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/235426592598/12903_2025_6610_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/ecea348fb6f0/12903_2025_6610_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/f7e473bea27a/12903_2025_6610_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/784031fe6f3a/12903_2025_6610_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/7a1e7c8947ec/12903_2025_6610_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/e32888c17f4e/12903_2025_6610_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/8a2f597adf34/12903_2025_6610_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/e3e428a837b9/12903_2025_6610_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/c4604be7b117/12903_2025_6610_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/fb618d70e8ec/12903_2025_6610_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/7264e9fb35b1/12903_2025_6610_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/235426592598/12903_2025_6610_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/ecea348fb6f0/12903_2025_6610_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/f7e473bea27a/12903_2025_6610_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/784031fe6f3a/12903_2025_6610_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/7a1e7c8947ec/12903_2025_6610_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/e32888c17f4e/12903_2025_6610_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/8a2f597adf34/12903_2025_6610_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/e3e428a837b9/12903_2025_6610_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/12276677/c4604be7b117/12903_2025_6610_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of various implant inclinations and abutment types in a bendable implant system.可弯曲种植体系统中不同种植体倾斜度和基台类型的生物力学比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06610-1.
2
Biomechanical Analysis of Various Connector Designs of Dental Implant Complex: A Numerical Finite Element Study.牙种植复合体不同连接设计的生物力学分析:一项数值有限元研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 26;75(4):100873. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100873.
3
Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.单颗种植体固位覆盖义齿:通过有限元分析评估种植体长度和直径对其应力分布的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr;33(4):348-357. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13795. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Comparison of Different Frameworks and Implant Angulations in All-On-Four and Six Concepts: A Finite Element Analysis.全口四颗和六颗种植概念中不同框架与种植体角度的比较:有限元分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Aug;27(4):e70078. doi: 10.1111/cid.70078.
5
Comparison of Subperiosteal Implant Designs Applied to Atrophic and Edentulous Mandible Under Traumatic Forces: 3D Finite Element Analysis.创伤力作用下应用于萎缩无牙下颌骨的骨膜下种植体设计比较:三维有限元分析
J Oral Implantol. 2025 Jul 15;51(3):295-303. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00073.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of conventional, zygomatic, zygomatic bone anchored subperiosteal and maxilla anchored subperiosteal implants applied totally edentulous maxilla: finite element stress analysis.常规种植体、颧骨种植体、颧骨骨膜下锚固种植体及上颌骨骨膜下锚固种植体应用于全口无牙上颌骨的生物力学评估:有限元应力分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06387-3.
7
The influence of prosthetic designs on peri-implant bone loss: An AO/AAP systematic review and meta-analysis.修复体设计对种植体周围骨吸收的影响:一项AO/AAP系统评价与Meta分析
J Periodontol. 2025 Jun;96(6):634-651. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0144. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
8
Biomechanical effects of digitally constructed titanium, modified polyetheretherketone, and polyetherketoneketone subperiosteal implants on atrophied maxilla: a finite element analysis.数字化构建的钛、改性聚醚醚酮和聚醚酮酮骨膜下种植体对萎缩上颌骨的生物力学效应:有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06426-z.
9
Mechanical behavior of hybrid custom implant abutments with various crown materials: a 3D finite element analysis.不同冠材料的混合定制种植体基台的力学行为:三维有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06445-w.
10
Comparative evaluation of pattern and distribution of stresses in single- and double-implant overdenture using ball-ring, positioner, and magnet-keeper attachment under different loading conditions: A finite element analysis.在不同加载条件下,使用球环、定位器和磁体保持器附件对单种植体覆盖义齿和双种植体覆盖义齿的应力模式和分布进行比较评估:有限元分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jan 1;25(1):86-94. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_179_24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol.不同角度修正设计对 All-On-Four 方案中倾斜种植体的有限元分析研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04091-2.
2
The All-on-four concept for fixed full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible: a longitudinal study in Japanese patients with 3-17-year follow-up and analysis of risk factors for survival rate.All-on-four 理念用于无牙颌上下颌的固定全口修复:一项对日本患者进行的长达 3-17 年随访的纵向研究,并对生存率的影响因素进行分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Nov 8;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00511-0.
3
Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept.
全口 4 颗种植体即刻负重中不同悬臂长度的倾斜种植体周围的应力的生物力学分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02520-8.
4
Stresses induced by one piece and two piece dental implants in All-on-4® implant supported prosthesis under simulated lateral occlusal loading: non linear finite element analysis study.在侧向咬合加载下,模拟全口义齿种植体支持式修复体中,单颗和双颗牙种植体所承受的应力:非线性有限元分析研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 22;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02228-9.
5
Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss with the all-on-4 immediate-loading strategy: A clinical retrospective study with 1 to 4 years of follow-up.采用 All-on-4 即刻负重策略的种植体存活率和边缘骨丧失:一项 1 至 4 年随访的临床回顾性研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec;130(6):849-857. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.020. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
6
Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible by All-on-Four Treatment Concept: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Up to 10 Years Follow-Up.全口四颗种植体治疗理念对无牙下颌骨的修复:一项长达10年随访的回顾性队列研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 22;58(1):10. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010010.
7
Influence of Framework Material and Posterior Implant Angulation in Full-Arch All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prosthesis Stress Concentration.全牙弓All-on-4种植支持式义齿中框架材料和种植体后置角度对应力集中的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;10(1):12. doi: 10.3390/dj10010012.
8
Clinical success between tilted and axial implants in edentulous maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无牙上颌中倾斜种植体和轴向种植体的临床效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jul-Sep;21(3):217-228. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_79_21.
9
Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.氧化锆冠修复的牙种植体的有限元分析:传统水泥固位与无水泥螺钉固位对比
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 19;14(10):2666. doi: 10.3390/ma14102666.
10
The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.四种种植体支持的上颌全口固定义齿支架材料对义齿基牙牙周组织应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021 Nov;24(14):1606-1617. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1903450. Epub 2021 Apr 2.