• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Suprapubic versus urethral catheter drainage in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: advancing systematic review quality.

作者信息

Hwang Eu Chang, Risk Michael C, Dahm Philipp

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Urology Section Minneapolis Veterans Healthcare System and Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1501-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2372-x. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2372-x
PMID:30006909
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Suprapubic versus urethral catheter drainage in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: advancing systematic review quality.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中耻骨上导尿与尿道导尿引流：提升系统评价质量
World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1501-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2372-x. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后耻骨上尿管引流与单纯留置尿管引流的比较。
J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
3
Suprapubic Versus Urethral Catheter for Urinary Drainage After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.耻骨上与尿道导尿管在机器人辅助前列腺根治术后的尿液引流比较。
Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Jun 6;21(8):30. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00982-3.
4
Suprapubic tube compared with urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.耻骨上管与尿道导管引流在机器人辅助前列腺根治术后的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
Suprapubic tube versus urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后耻骨上造瘘管引流与尿道导管引流的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Urol. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0312-5.
6
An Assessment of Patient Comfort and Morbidity After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Suprapubic Tube Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage.耻骨上造瘘管引流与尿道导尿管引流的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者舒适度及发病率评估
J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):300-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0206. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence.耻骨上与尿道导尿管在后机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术：当前证据的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1365-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2275-x. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
8
Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy.经皮耻骨上膀胱造瘘管引流对前列腺癌根治术后患者不适的影响
Eur Urol. 2009 Aug;56(2):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.018. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
9
Do silver alloy-coated catheters increase risk of urethral strictures after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?银合金涂层导管是否会增加机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄的风险？
Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):365-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.032. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
10
Postoperative patient comfort in suprapubic drainage versus transurethral catheterization following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后耻骨上引流与经尿道导尿对患者术后舒适度的影响：一项前瞻性随机临床试验
World J Urol. 2017 Mar;35(3):389-394. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1883-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Puncture: A Viable Alternative for Difficult Removal of an Indwelling Catheter in a Postrobot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Patient.经直肠超声引导下经会阴穿刺：机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后患者留置导尿管难以拔除时的可行替代方法
J Endourol Case Rep. 2020 Dec 29;6(4):516-518. doi: 10.1089/cren.2019.0147. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence.耻骨上与尿道导尿管在后机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术：当前证据的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1365-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2275-x. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
2
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2：一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具，该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究，或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
3
Transurethral versus suprapubic catheter at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中经尿道与耻骨上导尿的比较：一项为期1年随访的前瞻性随机试验。
World J Urol. 2016 Mar;34(3):407-11. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1678-1. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后耻骨上尿管引流与单纯留置尿管引流的比较。
J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
5
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision.GRADE 指南 6. 评估证据质量——不精确。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
6
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?什么是“证据质量”，它对临床医生为何重要？
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE.
7
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.评估非随机干预研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. doi: 10.3310/hta7270.
8
Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale.评估随机试验的质量： Jadad量表的可靠性
Control Clin Trials. 1999 Oct;20(5):448-52. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(99)00026-4.