Division of Aquaculture and Seafood Upgrading, Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, I.P. (IPMA), Rua Alfredo Magalhães Ramalho, 6, 1495-006 Lisboa Portugal; Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), Universidade do Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal; MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Laboratório Marítimo da Guia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Nossa Senhora do Cabo, 939, 2750-374 Cascais, Portugal.
Division of Aquaculture and Seafood Upgrading, Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, I.P. (IPMA), Rua Alfredo Magalhães Ramalho, 6, 1495-006 Lisboa Portugal; Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), Universidade do Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal.
Aquat Toxicol. 2018 Sep;202:65-79. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Pharmaceutical drugs, such as diclofenac (DCF), are frequently detected in the marine environment, and recent evidence has pointed out their toxicity to non-target marine biota. Concomitantly, altered environmental conditions associated with climate change (e.g. warming and acidification) can also affect the physiology of marine organisms. Yet, the underlying interactions between these environmental stressors (pharmaceutical exposure and climate change-related stressors) still require a deeper understanding. Comprehending the influence of abiotic variables on chemical contaminants' toxicological attributes provides a broader view of the ecological consequences of climate change. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the ecotoxicological responses of juvenile seabass Dicenthrachus labrax under the co-exposure to DCF (from dietary sources, 500 ± 36 ng kg dw), warming (ΔTºC = +5 °C) and acidification (ΔpCO ∼1000 μatm, equivalent to ΔpH = -0.4 units), using an "Integrated Biomarker Response" (IBR) approach. Fish were exposed to these three stressors, acting alone or combined, for 28 days in a full cross-factorial design, and blood, brain, liver and muscle tissues were subsequently collected in order to evaluate: i) animal/organ fitness; ii) hematological parameters and iii) molecular biomarkers. Results not only confirmed the toxicological attributes of dietary exposure to DCF in marine fish species at the tissue (e.g. lower HSI), cellular (e.g. increased ENAs and lower erythrocytes viability) and molecular levels (e.g. increased oxidative stress, protein degradation, AChE activity and VTG synthesis), but also showed that such attributes are altered by warming and acidification. Hence, while acidification and/or warming enhanced some effects of DCF exposure (e.g. by further lowering erythrocyte viability, and increasing brain GST activity and Ub synthesis in muscle), the co-exposure to these abiotic stressors also resulted in a reversion/inhibition of some molecular responses (e.g. lower CAT and SOD inhibition and VTG synthesis). IBRs evidenced that an overall higher degree of stress (i.e. high IBR index) was associated with DCF and warming co-exposure, while the effects of acidification were less evident. The distinct responses observed when DCF acted alone or the animals were co-exposed to the drug together with warming and acidification not only highlighted the relevance of considering the interactions between multiple environmental stressors in ecotoxicological studies, but also suggested that the toxicity of pharmaceuticals can be aggravated by climate change-related stressors (particularly warming), thus, posing additional biological challenges to marine fish populations.
药物,如双氯芬酸(DCF),经常在海洋环境中被检测到,最近的证据指出它们对海洋非目标生物具有毒性。同时,与气候变化相关的环境条件的改变(如变暖、酸化)也会影响海洋生物的生理机能。然而,这些环境胁迫因素(药物暴露和与气候变化相关的胁迫因素)之间的潜在相互作用仍需要更深入的了解。了解非生物变量对化学污染物毒理学特性的影响,可以更全面地了解气候变化对生态的影响。因此,本研究的目的是评估在幼鲈(Dicenthrachus labrax)同时暴露于 DCF(饮食来源,500±36ngkgdw)、变暖(ΔTºC=+5°C)和酸化(ΔpCO∼1000µatm,相当于 ΔpH=-0.4 个单位)下,通过“综合生物标志物反应”(IBR)方法评估其生态毒理学反应。在完全交叉因子设计中,鱼在这三种胁迫因素单独或组合作用下暴露 28 天,随后收集血液、大脑、肝脏和肌肉组织,以评估:i)动物/器官的适应性;ii)血液参数和 iii)分子生物标志物。结果不仅证实了在海洋鱼类中,通过饮食暴露于 DCF 具有毒理学特性,可在组织(例如较低的 HSI)、细胞(例如,增加 ENA 且降低红细胞活力)和分子水平(例如,增加氧化应激、蛋白质降解、AChE 活性和 VTG 合成)上观察到这种特性,而且还表明这些特性会因变暖酸化而改变。因此,虽然酸化和/或变暖增强了 DCF 暴露的某些影响(例如,进一步降低红细胞活力,增加大脑 GST 活性和肌肉中 Ub 的合成),但这些非生物胁迫因素的共同暴露也导致了一些分子反应的逆转/抑制(例如,CAT 和 SOD 抑制以及 VTG 合成的降低)。IBR 表明,整体较高的应激程度(即高 IBR 指数)与 DCF 和变暖的共同暴露有关,而酸化的影响则不太明显。当 DCF 单独作用或当动物同时暴露于药物和变暖酸化时,观察到的不同反应不仅强调了在生态毒理学研究中考虑多种环境胁迫因素相互作用的重要性,而且还表明与气候变化相关的胁迫因素(特别是变暖)会加剧药物的毒性,从而对海洋鱼类种群构成额外的生物挑战。