• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微流控分选与分割精液样本中的密度梯度离心与游移法相比,可减少 DNA 损伤,从而选择用于临床的精子。

Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, 550 16th Street, 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Stanford Canary Center for Early Cancer Detection, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Dr, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1388-1393. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey239.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/dey239
PMID:30007319
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Does microfluidic sorting improve the selection of sperm with lower DNA fragmentation over standard density-gradient centrifugation?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Microfluidic sorting of unprocessed semen allows for the selection of clinically usable, highly motile sperm with nearly undetectable levels of DNA fragmentation.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Microfluidic devices have been explored to sort motile and morphologically normal sperm from a raw sample without centrifugation; however, it is uncertain whether DNA damage is reduced in this process.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a blinded, controlled laboratory study of differences in standard semen analysis parameters and the DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in split samples from infertile men (n = 70) that were discarded after routine semen analysis at an academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Sperm concentration, progressive motility and forward progression were assessed by microscopic examination. For each sample, the unprocessed semen was tested for DNA fragmentation and split for processing by density-gradient centrifugation with swim-up or sorting by a microfluidic chip. DNA fragmentation was assessed in unprocessed and processed samples by sperm chromatin dispersion assay. The DFI was calculated, from up to 300 cells per slide, as the number of cells with fragmented DNA divided by the number of cells counted per slide.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The median DFI in unprocessed samples was 21% (interquartile range (IQR): 14-30). In paired analyses of all samples, those processed by the microfluidic chip demonstrated significantly decreased DFI compared to those processed by density-gradient centrifugation (P = 0.0029) and unprocessed samples (P < 0.0001). The median DFI for chip specimens was 0% (IQR: 0-2.4) while those processed by density-gradient centrifugation had a median DFI of 6% (IQR: 2-11). Unprocessed samples in the highest DFI quartile (DFI range: 31-40%) had a median DFI of 15% (IQR: 11-19%) after density-gradient centrifugation and DFI of 0% (IQR: 0-1.9%) after processing with the microfluidic chip (P = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: While a high DFI has been associated with poor outcomes with IVF/ICSI, there are limited data illustrating improvements in clinical outcomes with a reduction in DFI. As this study utilized discarded, non-clinical samples, clinical outcomes data are not available.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

While microfluidic sorting of unprocessed semen allowed for the selection of clinically usable, highly motile sperm with nearly undetectable levels of DNA fragmentation, standard processing by density-gradient centrifugation with swim-up did not increase DNA fragmentation in an infertile population. The proposed microfluidic technology offers a flow-free approach to sort sperm, requiring no peripheral equipment or filtration step, while minimizing hands-on time.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding to declare. Utkan Demirci, PhD is the Co-founder and Scientific Advisor for DxNow Inc., LevitasBio Inc. and Koek Biotech. Mitchell Rosen, MD is a member of the Clinical Advisory Board for DxNow Inc.

摘要

研究问题

微流控分选是否优于标准密度梯度离心法,改善精子 DNA 碎片率低的选择?

总结答案

未处理精液的微流控分选可选择具有临床可用性、高活力且 DNA 碎片化程度几乎可检测到的精子。

已知内容

已经探索了微流控装置来对原始样本中的运动和形态正常的精子进行分选,而无需离心;然而,在这个过程中是否降低了 DNA 损伤尚不确定。

研究设计、大小、持续时间:这是一项在学术医疗中心进行的盲法、对照实验室研究,比较了不育男性(n = 70)常规精液分析后丢弃的精液分析参数和 DNA 碎片指数(DFI)的差异。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:通过显微镜检查评估精子浓度、前向运动和前向进展。对于每个样本,用未处理的精液测试 DNA 碎片化,并通过密度梯度离心法的泳动或微流控芯片进行处理进行分割。用精子染色质弥散试验评估未处理和处理过的样本中的 DNA 碎片化。DFI 是通过每个载玻片最多 300 个细胞计算得出的,即具有碎片化 DNA 的细胞数除以每个载玻片上的细胞数。

主要结果和机会的作用

未处理样本的中位数 DFI 为 21%(四分位距(IQR):14-30)。在所有样本的配对分析中,与密度梯度离心法处理的样本(P = 0.0029)和未处理的样本(P < 0.0001)相比,用微流控芯片处理的样本 DFI 显著降低。芯片标本的中位数 DFI 为 0%(IQR:0-2.4),而密度梯度离心法处理的标本中位数 DFI 为 6%(IQR:2-11)。DFI 最高四分位数(DFI 范围:31-40%)的未处理样本经密度梯度离心后中位数 DFI 为 15%(IQR:11-19%),经微流控芯片处理后中位数 DFI 为 0%(IQR:0-1.9%)(P = 0.02)。

局限性、谨慎的原因:虽然高 DFI 与 IVF/ICSI 不良结局相关,但有数据表明降低 DFI 可改善临床结局。由于本研究使用了丢弃的非临床样本,因此无法获得临床结局数据。

研究结果的更广泛影响

虽然微流控分选未处理的精液可选择具有临床可用性、高活力且 DNA 碎片化程度几乎可检测到的精子,但标准的密度梯度离心法与泳动处理并没有增加不育人群的 DNA 碎片化。所提出的微流控技术提供了一种无流动的方法来分选精子,不需要外围设备或过滤步骤,同时最大限度地减少人工操作时间。

研究资金/竞争利益:没有外部资金申报。Utkan Demirci,博士是 DxNow Inc.、LevitasBio Inc. 和 Koek Biotech 的联合创始人兼科学顾问。Mitchell Rosen,医学博士是 DxNow Inc. 的临床顾问委员会成员。

相似文献

1
Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.微流控分选与分割精液样本中的密度梯度离心与游移法相比,可减少 DNA 损伤,从而选择用于临床的精子。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1388-1393. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey239.
2
Microfluidic sperm sorting selects a subpopulation of high-quality sperm with a higher potential for fertilization.微流控精子分选技术可筛选出具有较高受精潜力的优质精子亚群。
Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):902-911. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae045.
3
The Effects of Microfluidic Sperm Sorting, Density Gradient and Swim-up Methods on Semen Oxidation Reduction Potential.微流控精子分选、密度梯度和泳动方法对精液氧化还原电位的影响。
Urol J. 2020 May 27;17(4):397-401. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5639.
4
Microfluidic preparation of spermatozoa for ICSI produces similar embryo quality to density-gradient centrifugation: a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.微流控法制备精子用于 ICSI 可产生与密度梯度离心法相似的胚胎质量:一项实用的、随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jun 30;37(7):1406-1413. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac099.
5
Separation efficiency of a microfluidic sperm sorter to minimize sperm DNA damage.一种微流控精子分选仪的分离效率,以尽量减少精子DNA损伤。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):315-21.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
6
Optimized sperm selection: a highly efficient device for the isolation of progressive motile sperm with low DNA fragmentation index.优化精子选择:一种高效的设备,用于分离具有低 DNA 碎片指数的前向运动精子。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Aug;41(8):2201-2209. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03168-9. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
7
The effects of different sperm preparation methods and incubation time on the sperm DNA fragmentation.不同精子制备方法及孵育时间对精子DNA碎片的影响。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011 Sep;14(3):187-91. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2011.604817. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
8
Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.与禁欲 4-7 天后相比,精液样本在禁欲 2 小时后精子运动学得到改善。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1364-1372. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex101.
9
Density gradient centrifugation prior to cryopreservation and hypotaurine supplementation improve post-thaw quality of sperm from infertile men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia.在冷冻保存前进行密度梯度离心和牛磺酸补充可改善少弱畸形精子症不育男性精子的解冻后质量。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2045-57. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det253. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
10
Live motile sperm sorting device for enhanced sperm-fertilization competency: comparative analysis with density-gradient centrifugation and microfluidic sperm sorting.用于提高精子受精能力的活体游动精子分选装置:与密度梯度离心和微流控精子分选的比较分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Aug;40(8):1855-1864. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02838-4. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Sperm Selection Using Microfluidic Techniques Significantly Decreases Sperm DNA Fragmentation (SDF), Enhancing Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用微流控技术进行精子筛选可显著降低精子DNA碎片化(SDF),提高生殖结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jun 30;14(7):792. doi: 10.3390/biology14070792.
2
Functional parameters of spermatozoa obtained by a new selection device.通过一种新型筛选装置获得的精子功能参数。
FEBS Open Bio. 2025 Sep;15(9):1471-1484. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70073. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
3
Comparison of Swim-Up and Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Methods in Selection of Sperm for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.
用于胞浆内单精子注射的精子选择中上浮法与微流控精子分选方法的比较
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 4;26(11):5374. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115374.
4
Clinical outcome using the Q300™ device in a reproductive laboratory environment: an open-label, non-controlled and non-randomized study.在生殖实验室环境中使用Q300™设备的临床结果:一项开放标签、非对照和非随机研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Jun 10;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01424-w.
5
Microfluidic Sorting Can Be Applied for Assisted Reproduction Sperm Selection in Different Cases of Semen Abnormalities.微流控分选可应用于不同精液异常病例的辅助生殖精子筛选。
Life (Basel). 2025 May 15;15(5):790. doi: 10.3390/life15050790.
6
Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Fertility.精子DNA碎片化与生育能力。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1469:305-332. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-82990-1_13.
7
Clinical validation and experiences of the microfluidics sperm selection device ZyMōt™ for standard IVF.用于标准体外受精的微流控精子筛选装置ZyMōt™的临床验证与经验
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Jul 30;29(2):244-250. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240104.
8
Embryology outcomes of a device-based sperm separation technique compared to density gradient centrifugation using thawed spermatozoa-a sibling donor oocyte study.与使用解冻精子的密度梯度离心法相比,基于设备的精子分离技术的胚胎学结果——一项同胞供体卵母细胞研究
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jan;42(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03336-x. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
9
Microfluidic in compared with Zeta potential, MACS and swim up methods, resulted in improved chromatin integrity and high quality sperms.与ζ电位、磁性激活细胞分选(MACS)和上游法相比,微流控技术可提高染色质完整性并获得高质量精子。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):35-40. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240075.
10
A narrative review of sperm selection technology for assisted reproduction techniques.辅助生殖技术中精子筛选技术的叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):2119-2133. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-195. Epub 2024 Sep 18.