Traini Giulia, Ragosta Maria Emanuela, Tamburrino Lara, Papini Alice, Cipriani Sarah, Vignozzi Linda, Baldi Elisabetta, Marchiani Sara
Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Andrology, Women's Endocrinology and Gender Incongruence Unit, Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2025 May 15;15(5):790. doi: 10.3390/life15050790.
Sperm preparation is a critical step in assisted reproduction, aiming to isolate spermatozoa with optimal characteristics and high fertilizing potential. Traditional sperm selection methods involve centrifugation, which may cause sperm damage. Microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS) offers an alternative approach, mimicking the female reproductive tract environment, avoiding centrifugation, and reducing manipulation and processing time. This study aims to compare the performance of MSS and Swim-up (SU) in 26 normozoospermic, 31 hyperviscous normozoospermic, 15 oligozoospermic, and 9 asthenozoospermic subjects. Semen samples were collected from male subjects undergoing routine semen analysis at Careggi University Hospital, Florence. Sperm selection was carried out using both SU and MSS. The parameters assessed included sperm motility, viability, concentration, kinematics, DNA fragmentation (sDF), chromatin compaction, and oxidative status. Both SU and MSS improved sperm characteristics compared to unselected samples. MSS isolated high-quality spermatozoa with lower sDF and higher chromatin compaction than SU, not only in normozoospermic samples but also in samples with semen defects like hyperviscosity, low concentration and/or motility, and high sDF. In conclusion, the use of microfluidics may enhance the chances of successful fertilization and improve reproductive outcomes, especially for individuals with compromised semen quality where conventional methods may fail.
精子制备是辅助生殖中的关键步骤,旨在分离出具有最佳特性和高受精潜力的精子。传统的精子选择方法包括离心,这可能会导致精子损伤。微流控精子分选(MSS)提供了一种替代方法,它模拟女性生殖道环境,避免离心,并减少操作和处理时间。本研究旨在比较MSS和上游法(SU)在26例正常精子症、31例高粘性正常精子症、15例少精子症和9例弱精子症患者中的性能。精液样本取自佛罗伦萨卡雷吉大学医院接受常规精液分析的男性受试者。使用SU和MSS进行精子选择。评估的参数包括精子活力、存活率、浓度、运动学、DNA碎片率(sDF)、染色质紧实度和氧化状态。与未分选的样本相比,SU和MSS均改善了精子特性。MSS分离出的高质量精子的sDF较低,染色质紧实度高于SU,不仅在正常精子症样本中如此,在存在精液缺陷如高粘性、低浓度和/或活力以及高sDF的样本中也是如此。总之,微流控技术的应用可能会增加成功受精的机会并改善生殖结局,特别是对于精液质量受损而传统方法可能无效的个体。