Deady Mark, Johnston David A, Glozier Nick, Milne David, Choi Isabella, Mackinnon Andrew, Mykletun Arnstein, Calvo Rafael A, Gayed Aimee, Bryant Richard, Christensen Helen, Harvey Samuel B
Black Dog Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 13;8(7):e020510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020510.
Depression is the leading cause of life years lost due to disability. Appropriate prevention has the potential to reduce the incidence of new cases of depression, however, traditional prevention approaches face significant scalability issues. Prevention programmes delivered by via smartphone applications provide a potential solution. The workplace is an ideal setting to roll out this form of intervention, particularly among industries that are unlikely to access traditional health initiatives and whose workplace characteristics create accessibility and portability issues. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a smartphone application designed to prevent depression and improve well-being. The effectiveness of the app as a universal, selective and indicated prevention tool will also be evaluated.
A multicentre randomised controlled trial, to determine the effectiveness of the intervention compared with an active mood monitoring control in reducing depressive symptoms (primary outcome) and the prevalence of depression at 3 months, with secondary outcomes assessing well-being and work performance. Employees from a range of industries will be invited to participate. Participants with likely current depression at baseline will be excluded. Following baseline assessment, participants, blinded to their allocation, will be randomised to receive one of two versions of the application: headgear (a 30-day mental health intervention) or a control application (mood monitoring for 30 days). Both versions of the app contain a risk calculator to provide a measure of future risk. Analyses will be conducted within an intention-to-treat framework using mixed modelling, with additional analyses conducted to compare the moderating effect of baseline risk level and depression symptom severity on the intervention's effectiveness.
The current trial has received ethics approval from the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HC17021). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
ACTRN12617000548336; Results.
抑郁症是导致因残疾而损失生命年数的主要原因。适当的预防措施有可能降低抑郁症新发病例的发生率,然而,传统的预防方法面临着重大的可扩展性问题。通过智能手机应用程序提供的预防方案提供了一种潜在的解决方案。工作场所是推出这种干预形式的理想环境,特别是在那些不太可能获得传统健康倡议且其工作场所特征导致可及性和便携性问题的行业中。本研究旨在评估一款旨在预防抑郁症并改善幸福感的智能手机应用程序的有效性。还将评估该应用程序作为通用、选择性和指示性预防工具的有效性。
一项多中心随机对照试验旨在确定与积极情绪监测对照相比,该干预措施在减轻抑郁症状(主要结局)和3个月时抑郁症患病率方面的有效性,次要结局评估幸福感和工作表现。将邀请来自一系列行业的员工参与。基线时可能患有当前抑郁症的参与者将被排除。在基线评估之后,对分配情况不知情的参与者将被随机分配接受该应用程序的两个版本之一:头戴式设备(一项为期30天的心理健康干预)或对照应用程序(30天的情绪监测)。两个版本的应用程序都包含一个风险计算器,以提供未来风险的衡量指标。将在意向性分析框架内使用混合模型进行分析,并进行额外分析以比较基线风险水平和抑郁症状严重程度对干预效果的调节作用。
当前试验已获得新南威尔士大学人类研究伦理委员会(HC17021)的伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审期刊和会议进行传播。
ACTRN12617000548336;结果。