• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将决策风格与社会取向和时间取向联系起来。

Relating Decision-Making Styles to Social Orientation and Time Approach.

作者信息

Geisler Martin, Allwood Carl Martin

机构信息

Department of Psychology University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.

出版信息

J Behav Decis Mak. 2018 Jul;31(3):415-429. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2066. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1002/bdm.2066
PMID:30008515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6032938/
Abstract

Research on decision-making styles has shown that stylistic differences matter for real-life outcomes, but less research has explored how styles relate to other differences between individuals. Heeding a call for a more systematic and theoretically sound understanding of decision-making styles, we investigated the relation between decision-making styles and specific aspects of social orientation and approach to time in two samples (students, n = 118, and police investigators, n = 90). The results of regression analyses showed that decision-making styles are related to specific differences in social orientation and time approach. Furthermore, results of structural equation model analyses suggested possible adjustments to the proposed two-factor model for decision-making styles (Dewberry, Juanchich, & Narendran, 2013a).

摘要

关于决策风格的研究表明,风格差异对现实生活结果很重要,但较少有研究探讨这些风格如何与个体之间的其他差异相关联。响应对于更系统且理论上合理地理解决策风格的呼吁,我们在两个样本(学生,n = 118;警察调查员,n = 90)中研究了决策风格与社会取向和时间处理方式的特定方面之间的关系。回归分析结果表明,决策风格与社会取向和时间处理方式的特定差异相关。此外,结构方程模型分析结果建议对所提出的决策风格双因素模型(Dewberry、Juanchich和Narendran,2013a)进行可能的调整。

相似文献

1
Relating Decision-Making Styles to Social Orientation and Time Approach.将决策风格与社会取向和时间取向联系起来。
J Behav Decis Mak. 2018 Jul;31(3):415-429. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2066. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Decision-Making Competence, Social Orientation, Time Style, and Perceived Stress.决策能力、社会取向、时间风格与感知压力
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 9;9:440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00440. eCollection 2018.
3
Decision-Making and the Alternative Five Factor Personality Model: Exploring the Role of Personality Traits, Age, Sex and Social Position.决策与替代性五因素人格模型:探索人格特质、年龄、性别和社会地位的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:717705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717705. eCollection 2021.
4
How decision-styles and cultural orientation influence entrepreneurial and social entrepreneurial intentions: A cross-cultural comparison.决策风格和文化取向如何影响创业意图和社会创业意图:一项跨文化比较。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 5;13:988815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988815. eCollection 2022.
5
How Parenting Styles Link Career Decision-Making Difficulties in Chinese College Students? The Mediating Effects of Core Self-Evaluation and Career Calling.育儿方式如何与中国大学生的职业决策困难相关联?核心自我评价和职业使命感的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 19;12:661600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661600. eCollection 2021.
6
Financial decision-making in a community sample of adults with and without current symptoms of ADHD.社区成年人样本中患有和不患有 ADHD 症状的个体的财务决策。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0239343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239343. eCollection 2020.
7
Relationship Between Basic Human Values and Decision-Making Styles in Adolescents.青少年基本人类价值观与决策风格的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8315. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228315.
8
Real-life decision making in college students. II: Do individual differences show reliable effects?大学生在现实生活中的决策。II:个体差异是否显示出可靠的影响?
Am J Psychol. 2014 Spring;127(1):33-42. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.1.0033.
9
Assessment of cognitive bias in decision-making and leadership styles among critical care nurses: a mixed methods study.评估重症监护护士决策和领导风格中的认知偏差:混合方法研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Feb;73(2):465-481. doi: 10.1111/jan.13142. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
[Decision-making style among hemodialysis patients].[血液透析患者的决策风格]
Kango Kenkyu. 1997 Mar-Apr;30(2):47-57.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptual framework of coaches' decision-making in conventional sports.传统体育中教练决策的概念框架。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1498186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1498186. eCollection 2024.
2
Getting even: chasing behavior, decision-making, and craving in habitual gamblers.报复行为:习惯性赌徒的决策、追涨行为和渴望。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 19;12(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01911-6.
3
The relationship between management strategies for menopausal symptoms and women's decision making styles during menopausal transition.

本文引用的文献

1
Competence and Quality in Real-Life Decision Making.现实生活决策中的能力与质量
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0142178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142178. eCollection 2015.
2
Variations in Decision-Making Profiles by Age and Gender: A Cluster-Analytic Approach.年龄和性别的决策特征差异:一种聚类分析方法。
Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Oct 1;85:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.034.
3
Anxiety, advice, and the ability to discern: feeling anxious motivates individuals to seek and use advice.焦虑、建议和辨别能力:感到焦虑会促使个人寻求和使用建议。
绝经过渡期间更年期症状管理策略与女性决策风格之间的关系。
Prz Menopauzalny. 2019 Dec;18(3):174-179. doi: 10.5114/pm.2019.90378. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
4
Decision-Making Styles, Negative Affectivity, and Cognitive Distortions in Adolescent Gambling.青少年赌博中的决策风格、负性情感和认知扭曲。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):517-531. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9790-y.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):497-512. doi: 10.1037/a0026413. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
4
Trait emotional intelligence and the dark triad traits of personality.特质情绪智力与人格的黑暗三性格特质
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011 Feb;14(1):35-41. doi: 10.1375/twin.14.1.35.
5
The neuroscience of social decision-making.社会决策的神经科学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:23-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647.
6
Decomposing model fit: measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables.分解模型拟合:使用潜在变量的组织研究中的测量与理论。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jan;96(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/a0020539.
7
Decision making, impulsivity and time perception.决策、冲动性与时间感知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jan;12(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.成人决策能力的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):938-956. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938.
9
The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.拖延的本质:对典型自我调节失败的元分析与理论综述。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):65-94. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65.
10
Helping one's way to the top: self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom.通过助人登上顶峰:自我监控者通过帮助他人以及了解谁帮助了谁来获得地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1123-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1123.