Geisler Martin, Allwood Carl Martin
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0142178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142178. eCollection 2015.
What distinguishes a competent decision maker and how should the issue of decision quality be approached in a real-life context? These questions were explored in three studies. In Study 1, using a web-based questionnaire and targeting a community sample, we investigated the relationships between objective and subjective indicators of real-life decision-making success. In Study 2 and 3, targeting two different samples of professionals, we explored if the prevalent cognitively oriented definition of decision-making competence could be beneficially expanded by adding aspects of competence in terms of social skills and time-approach. The predictive power for each of these three aspects of decision-making competence was explored for different indicators of real-life decision-making success. Overall, our results suggest that research on decision-making competence would benefit by expanding the definition of competence, by including decision-related abilities in terms of social skills and time-approach. Finally, the results also indicate that individual differences in real-life decision-making success profitably can be approached and measured by different criteria.
一个称职的决策者有哪些特质,在现实生活中应如何看待决策质量问题?三项研究探讨了这些问题。在研究1中,我们通过网络问卷,以社区样本为目标,调查了现实生活中决策成功的客观指标与主观指标之间的关系。在研究2和研究3中,我们以两个不同的专业人员样本为目标,探讨了能否通过增加社交技能和时间管理方面的能力,有益地扩展普遍的认知导向型决策能力定义。针对现实生活中决策成功的不同指标,探讨了决策能力这三个方面各自的预测能力。总体而言,我们的结果表明,决策能力研究将受益于扩展能力定义,将社交技能和时间管理方面与决策相关的能力纳入其中。最后,结果还表明,现实生活中决策成功的个体差异可以通过不同标准进行有益的探讨和衡量。