• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当领导力推动团队学习:一项元分析

When Leadership Powers Team Learning: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Koeslag-Kreunen Mieke, Van den Bossche Piet, Hoven Michael, Van der Klink Marcel, Gijselaers Wim

机构信息

Zuyd Hogeschool, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

University of Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Small Group Res. 2018 Aug;49(4):475-513. doi: 10.1177/1046496418764824. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1177/1046496418764824
PMID:30008542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6027782/
Abstract

Team learning behavior is found to be one of the most effective team processes, as learning behavior at the team level (e.g., sharing, discussing, and reflecting on knowledge and actions) enables teams to adapt existing or develop new knowledge. Team leadership behavior is considered a critical accelerant for creating conditions that are essential to engage in team learning behavior, such as a safe environment. Yet despite the growing amount of research in team learning, this relationship remains unclear. Meta-analytic techniques were used to examine when team leadership behaviors support team learning behavior and how the task type moderates that relationship. Forty-three empirical studies reporting 92 effect sizes were synthesized. Analyses show that team leadership behavior explains 18% of the variance in team learning behavior. Furthermore, results indicate that person-focused leaders foster team learning for both adaptive and developmental tasks, whereas task-focused leaders influence team learning for adaptive tasks only.

摘要

团队学习行为被认为是最有效的团队过程之一,因为团队层面的学习行为(例如,分享、讨论和反思知识与行动)使团队能够调整现有知识或开发新知识。团队领导行为被视为创造参与团队学习行为所必需条件(如安全环境)的关键促进因素。然而,尽管团队学习的研究数量不断增加,但这种关系仍不明确。本研究采用元分析技术来检验团队领导行为在何时支持团队学习行为,以及任务类型如何调节这种关系。本研究综合了43项实证研究,报告了92个效应量。分析表明,团队领导行为解释了团队学习行为中18%的变异。此外,结果表明,关注人员的领导者促进适应性和发展性任务的团队学习,而关注任务的领导者仅影响适应性任务的团队学习。

相似文献

1
When Leadership Powers Team Learning: A Meta-Analysis.当领导力推动团队学习:一项元分析
Small Group Res. 2018 Aug;49(4):475-513. doi: 10.1177/1046496418764824. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Leaders' induced justice perceptions as mediator of the relation between participative leadership behaviors and team learning.领导者的诱导性公正认知作为参与式领导行为与团队学习关系的中介变量。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 27;14:1244273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1244273. eCollection 2023.
3
Enhancing Team Learning through Leader Inclusiveness: A One-Year Ethnographic Case Study of an Interdisciplinary Teacher Team.通过领导者的包容性增强团队学习:对跨学科教师团队的为期一年的人种学案例研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;33(5):498-508. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1887738. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and reflection, and work teams' performance: A structural equation modelling analysis.变革型领导、知识分享与反思,以及工作团队的绩效:结构方程模型分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Oct;28(7):1627-1634. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13118. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
A Video Analysis of Intra- and Interprofessional Leadership Behaviors Within "The Burns Suite": Identifying Key Leadership Models.《烧伤套房内的医患间领导力行为的视频分析:确定关键领导力模式》
J Surg Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;73(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.引领多样性:迈向多元化团队功能型领导理论。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Oct;105(10):1101-1128. doi: 10.1037/apl0000482. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
The Power of Peer Leaders: Exploring the Link between Peer Leadership Behaviors and Sustainable Work Outcomes.同伴领导者的力量:探索同伴领导行为与可持续工作成果之间的联系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;14(1):2. doi: 10.3390/bs14010002.
8
A leadership model supporting maturation of high-performance translational teams.一种支持高性能转化团队成熟发展的领导模式。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jul 24;7(1):e171. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.598. eCollection 2023.
9
Uncover it, students would learn leadership from Team-Based Learning (TBL): The effect of guided reflection and feedback.揭示它,学生将从基于团队的学习(TBL)中学习领导力:引导反思和反馈的效果。
Med Teach. 2017 Apr;39(4):395-401. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1293237. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
10
How can leaders foster team learning? Effects of leader-assigned mastery and performance goals and psychological safety.领导者如何促进团队学习?领导者分配的掌握和绩效目标以及心理安全的影响。
J Psychol. 2013 Nov-Dec;147(6):541-61. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.719940.

引用本文的文献

1
Becoming Leaders - A Qualitative Research Study on the Priorities and Concerns of Early Career Women Faculty in Academic Medicine.成为领导者——一项关于医学学术领域早期职业女性教员优先事项和关注点的定性研究
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Dec 2;16:511-523. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S499001. eCollection 2024.
2
Servant leadership and project success: the mediating roles of team learning orientation and team agility.仆人式领导与项目成功:团队学习导向和团队敏捷性的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 1;15:1417604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417604. eCollection 2024.
3
Qualitative expert evaluation of an educational intervention outline aimed at developing a shared understanding of cross-border healthcare.

本文引用的文献

1
Team Leader Structuring for Team Effectiveness and Team Learning in Command-and-Control Teams.指挥控制团队中为实现团队效能和团队学习而进行的团队领导架构设计。
Small Group Res. 2017 Apr;48(2):215-248. doi: 10.1177/1046496417689897. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
2
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.提高工作团队的效率。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
3
Leading team learning: what makes interprofessional teams learn to work well?引领团队学习:是什么促使跨专业团队学会高效协作?
定性专家评估一项教育干预大纲,旨在建立对跨境医疗保健的共同理解。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Apr 15;41(2):Doc17. doi: 10.3205/zma001672. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring the Impact of Leader Bottom-Line Mentality on Subordinate Learning from Work Failures: A Social Information Processing Perspective.从社会信息加工视角探究领导者底线思维对下属从工作失败中学习的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;14(3):226. doi: 10.3390/bs14030226.
5
From purists to pragmatists: a qualitative evaluation of how implementation processes and contexts shaped the uptake and methodological adaptations of a maternal and neonatal quality improvement programme in South Africa prior to, and during COVID-19.从纯粹主义者到实用主义者:在 COVID-19 之前和期间,对南非实施孕产妇和新生儿质量改进计划的实施过程和背景如何影响其采用和方法学调整的定性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09826-5.
6
Team behaviors as antecedents for team members' work engagement in interdisciplinary health care teams.团队行为作为跨学科医疗团队中团队成员工作投入的前因。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1196154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196154. eCollection 2023.
7
Internal fights over resources: The effect of power struggles on team innovation.资源内部争斗:权力斗争对团队创新的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;13:996737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996737. eCollection 2022.
8
The role of E-leadership in ICT utilization: a project management perspective.电子领导力在信息通信技术利用中的作用:项目管理视角
Inf Technol Manag. 2023;24(2):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s10799-021-00354-4. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
9
The impact of organizational culture and leadership climate on organizational attractiveness and innovative behavior: a study of Norwegian hospital employees.组织文化和领导风气对组织吸引力和创新行为的影响:对挪威医院员工的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 13;22(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08042-x.
10
Should you become a leader in online collaborative learning? Impact of assigned leadership on learning behaviors, outcomes, and perceptions.你是否会成为在线协作学习的领导者?分配领导角色对学习行为、结果和感知的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266653. eCollection 2022.
J Interprof Care. 2014 Nov;28(6):513-8. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.900001. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
4
How can leaders foster team learning? Effects of leader-assigned mastery and performance goals and psychological safety.领导者如何促进团队学习?领导者分配的掌握和绩效目标以及心理安全的影响。
J Psychol. 2013 Nov-Dec;147(6):541-61. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.719940.
5
How to do a meta-analysis.如何进行荟萃分析。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 Nov;63(Pt 3):665-94. doi: 10.1348/000711010X502733. Epub 2010 May 21.
6
Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models.组织中的团队:从输入-过程-输出模型到IMOI模型。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:517-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.
7
Team learning: collectively connecting the dots.团队学习:共同建立联系。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):821-35. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.821.
8
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis.任务冲突与关系冲突、团队绩效及团队成员满意度:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):741-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741.
9
Chronic illness experience: insights from a metastudy.
Qual Health Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):437-52. doi: 10.1177/104973202129120007.
10
Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work.专业工作中的非正式学习与隐性知识
Br J Educ Psychol. 2000 Mar;70 ( Pt 1):113-36. doi: 10.1348/000709900158001.