Suppr超能文献

快速眼动睡眠行为障碍筛查问卷在新发帕金森病中无效。

The REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire is not Valid in De Novo Parkinson's Disease.

作者信息

Halsband Claire, Zapf Antonia, Sixel-Döring Friederike, Trenkwalder Claudia, Mollenhauer Brit

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology University Medical Center Göttingen Germany.

Department of Neurosurgery University Medical Center Göttingen Germany.

出版信息

Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Mar 1;5(2):171-176. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12591. eCollection 2018 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is one of the most specific prodromal indicators for Parkinson's disease (PD).

OBJECTIVES

To test the validity of the RBD-Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ) in assessing RBD in early PD.

METHODS

The RBDSQ was completed before video-supported polysomnography (vPSG) by 134 de novo PD patients, 109 matched controls without neurological disorder (CTR) and 30 subjects with idiopathic RBD (iRBD) without clinical signs of PD; results were compared with vPSG-confirmed RBD diagnosis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity/specificity of the RBDSQ for the PD cohort were 0.44/0.84 at the previously published cut-off score of 6 for PD patients, and the area under the curve (AUC) 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56-0.79). By contrast, in the iRBD/CTR cohort the RBDSQ (cut-off = 5) had a sensitivity/specificity of 0.97/0.84 and an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00). Subanalysis of question 6 only (4 subitems asking for dream enactment) at a cut-off score of 1 revealed a sensitivity of 0.74 and a specificity of 0.70 for the de novo PD cohort, AUC was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.63-0.84). RBDSQ is an insufficient screening tool for RBD in de novo PD. New screening tools for RBD assessment need to be developed.

摘要

背景

快速眼动(REM)睡眠行为障碍(RBD)是帕金森病(PD)最具特异性的前驱指标之一。

目的

检验RBD筛查问卷(RBDSQ)在评估早期PD患者RBD方面的有效性。

方法

134例新发PD患者、109例无神经系统疾病的匹配对照(CTR)和30例无PD临床体征的特发性RBD(iRBD)患者在视频辅助多导睡眠图(vPSG)检查前完成RBDSQ;将结果与vPSG确诊的RBD诊断结果进行比较。

结果与结论

对于PD队列,在先前公布的PD患者截断分数为6分时,RBDSQ的敏感性/特异性为0.44/0.84,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.68(95%CI,0.56 - 0.79)。相比之下,在iRBD/CTR队列中,RBDSQ(截断分数 = 5)的敏感性/特异性为0.97/0.84,AUC为0.95(95%CI,0.90 - 1.00)。仅对问题6(询问梦境演绎的4个分项)进行亚分析,截断分数为1时,新发PD队列的敏感性为0.74,特异性为0.70,AUC为0.74(95%CI,0.63 - 0.84)。RBDSQ是评估新发PD患者RBD的一种不足的筛查工具。需要开发新的RBD评估筛查工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449e/6174510/b287f54265ca/MDC3-5-171-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验