Onishi Eiko, Murakami Mamoru, Nishino Ryo, Ohba Ruri, Yamauchi Masanori
Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Hospital.
Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku Kosai Hospital.
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2018 Jul;245(3):179-185. doi: 10.1620/tjem.245.179.
Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and paravertebral block (PVB) have been performed for perioperative regional anesthesia in the trunk. However, TEA and PVB are associated with a risk of serious complications, such as pneumothorax, hypotension, or nerve damage. Retrolaminar paravertebral block (RLB) was introduced as a new alternative to PVB. This new approach might lower the risk of serious complications, but its use has not been well established yet. Therefore, we conducted a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a double-level RLB for postoperative analgesia after breast cancer surgery. A total of 122 women who underwent breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection under general anesthesia were allocated into RLB group (60 patients) and Control group (62 patients). RLB was performed upon surgery completion with 15 ml ropivacaine (0.5%) for each lamina of the T2 and T4 vertebrae. In Control group, the same volume of normal saline was injected at each level. The time to first postoperative analgesic administration was significantly longer in RLB group than that in Control group (161.5 min vs. 64.0 min). The pain score in RLB group was significantly lower immediately after surgery. However, the number of patients requiring analgesics during the 12-hour post-surgical period was similar between RLB group (20 patients) and Control group (22 patients). In conclusion, the double-level RLB could delay the time to initial administration of analgesics, but this technique may be insufficient to reduce the analgesic requirement within the 12-hour postoperative period following breast cancer surgery.
胸段硬膜外麻醉(TEA)和椎旁阻滞(PVB)已用于躯干围手术期区域麻醉。然而,TEA和PVB存在严重并发症风险,如气胸、低血压或神经损伤。椎板后椎旁阻滞(RLB)作为PVB的一种新替代方法被引入。这种新方法可能会降低严重并发症的风险,但其应用尚未得到充分确立。因此,我们进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验,以评估双平面RLB用于乳腺癌手术后镇痛的疗效。共有122例在全身麻醉下行乳腺癌手术并腋窝淋巴结清扫的女性被分为RLB组(60例患者)和对照组(62例患者)。手术结束时,在T2和T4椎体的每个椎板处用15 ml罗哌卡因(0.5%)进行RLB。对照组在每个水平注射相同体积的生理盐水。RLB组术后首次给予镇痛药物的时间明显长于对照组(161.5分钟对64.0分钟)。术后即刻RLB组的疼痛评分明显较低。然而,RLB组(20例患者)和对照组(22例患者)在术后12小时内需要镇痛药物的患者数量相似。总之,双平面RLB可延迟首次给予镇痛药物的时间,但该技术可能不足以减少乳腺癌手术后12小时内的镇痛需求。