Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Translational Research Unit for Anatomy and Analgesia, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug;75(4):295-306. doi: 10.4097/kja.22138. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Various techniques for regional anesthesia and analgesia of the thorax are currently being used in clinical practice. A recent international consensus has anatomically classified paraspinal blocks in the thoracic spinal region into the following four types: paravertebral, retrolaminar, erector spinae plane, and intertransverse process blocks. These blocks have different anatomical targets; thus, the spreading patterns of the injectates differ and can consequently exhibit different neural blockade characteristics. The paravertebral block directly targets the paravertebral space just outside the neuraxial region and has an analgesic efficacy comparable to that of the epidural block; however, there are multiple potential risks associated with this technique. Retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks target the erector spinae plane on the vertebral lamina and transverse process, respectively. In anatomical studies, these two blocks showed different injectate spreading patterns to the back muscles and the fascial plane. In cadaveric studies, paravertebral spread was identified, but variable. However, numerous clinical reports have shown paravertebral spread with erector spinae plane blocks. Both techniques have been found to reduce postoperative pain compared to controls; however, the results have been more inconsistent than with the paravertebral block. Finally, the intertransverse process block targets the tissue complex posterior to the superior costotransverse ligament. Anatomical studies have revealed that this block has pathways that are more direct and closer to the paravertebral space than the retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks. Cadaveric evaluations have consistently shown promising results; however, further clinical studies using this technique are needed to confirm these anatomical findings.
目前,临床上应用多种技术进行胸部区域麻醉和镇痛。最近的一项国际共识将胸椎旁间隙阻滞根据解剖学分为以下四种类型:椎旁阻滞、椎板间阻滞、竖脊肌平面阻滞和横突间阻滞。这些阻滞的解剖学目标不同,因此,注射药物的扩散模式也不同,从而表现出不同的神经阻滞特征。椎旁阻滞直接靶向椎管外的椎旁间隙,其镇痛效果可与硬膜外阻滞相媲美,但该技术存在多种潜在风险。椎板间阻滞和竖脊肌平面阻滞分别靶向椎板和横突上的竖脊肌平面。在解剖学研究中,这两种阻滞显示出不同的注射药物向背部肌肉和筋膜平面扩散的模式。在尸体研究中,发现了椎旁扩散,但存在变异性。然而,许多临床报告显示,竖脊肌平面阻滞可导致椎旁扩散。与对照组相比,这两种技术均能减轻术后疼痛,但结果不如椎旁阻滞一致。最后,横突间阻滞的目标是位于上肋横突韧带后方的组织复合体。解剖学研究表明,与椎板间和竖脊肌平面阻滞相比,该阻滞具有更直接、更接近椎旁间隙的途径。尸体评估一直显示出有希望的结果;然而,需要进一步的临床研究来验证这种技术的解剖学发现。