Drovandi Aaron, Teague Peta-Ann, Glass Beverley, Malau-Aduli Bunmi
College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;27(2):121-130. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12470. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
We aimed to identify the experiences of Australian community pharmacists with smokers and their associated perceptions of effective health warnings on individual cigarette sticks.
A mixed-methods online survey was distributed to Australian pharmacists through pharmacy-specific social media pages, and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, followed by semi-structured face-to-face interviews with pharmacists in Townsville, Australia, who were purposively sampled. The interviews continued until data saturation was achieved. Participants described their experiences with smokers, perceptions and effectiveness ratings of current cigarette packaging warnings, and 12 text warnings (divided into four themes) on individual cigarette sticks, and their general opinions on effective anti-tobacco health warnings.
Seventy pharmacists participated in the survey and 17 pharmacists in the interviews. Both groups of pharmacists cited smoking-related personal or close-contact illness, pressure by family members or physicians and the financial costs of smoking as being the main drivers for quit attempts. Most interviewed pharmacists interact with smokers several times per week. Cigarette stick warnings describing mortality consequences (especially the 'minutes of life lost' warning) and the financial consequences of tobacco use were rated as significantly more effective than current packaging warnings (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-4.12, P = 0.02, and 1.97; 95%CI: 1.01-3.84, P = 0.04, respectively).
Pharmacists have considerable experience assisting smokers with quitting and based on these experiences believe that novel and tangible health warnings on cigarette sticks may be an effective future measure to combat tobacco use. Further research on the opinions of a more diverse range of health professionals and the general community will generate more robust findings regarding this method of intervention.
我们旨在了解澳大利亚社区药剂师与吸烟者打交道的经历,以及他们对单支香烟上有效健康警示的相关看法。
通过特定于药房的社交媒体页面以及澳大利亚药剂师协会,向澳大利亚药剂师开展了一项混合方法在线调查,随后对澳大利亚汤斯维尔市的药剂师进行了半结构化面对面访谈,这些药剂师是经过有目的抽样选取的。访谈持续进行直至达到数据饱和。参与者描述了他们与吸烟者打交道的经历、对当前香烟包装警示的看法和有效性评级、单支香烟上的12条文字警示(分为四个主题),以及他们对有效的反烟草健康警示的总体意见。
70名药剂师参与了调查,17名药剂师接受了访谈。两组药剂师都提到与吸烟相关的个人或密切接触者患病、家庭成员或医生的压力以及吸烟的经济成本是尝试戒烟的主要驱动因素。大多数接受访谈的药剂师每周与吸烟者互动数次。描述死亡后果(尤其是“生命损失的分钟数”警示)和烟草使用经济后果的单支香烟警示被评为比当前包装警示显著更有效(优势比[OR]=2.23;95%置信区间[CI]:1.12 - 4.12,P = 0.02;以及1.97;95%CI:1.01 - 3.84,P = 0.04)。
药剂师在协助吸烟者戒烟方面有丰富经验,基于这些经验,他们认为单支香烟上新颖且切实的健康警示可能是未来抗击烟草使用的一项有效措施。对更多样化的健康专业人员和普通社区的意见进行进一步研究,将产生关于这种干预方法的更有力研究结果。