• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Survival outcomes after D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy with R0 resection in stage II-III gastric cancer: Longitudinal follow-up in a single center.II-III期胃癌行D1和D2淋巴结清扫及R0切除后的生存结果:单中心纵向随访
Turk J Surg. 2018 Jul 1;34(2):125-130. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.3846. eCollection 2018.
2
A comparison of the operative outcomes of D1 and D2 gastrectomy performed at a single Western center with multiple surgeons: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.单一西方中心多位外科医生行 D1 与 D2 胃切除术的手术结局比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1422-6.
3
Comparison of long term survival outcomes between D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for ≥ pT2 or pN+ gastric carcinoma: A large scale case-control study using propensity score matching.比较 D1+ 和 D2 淋巴结清扫术对≥pT2 或 pN+ 胃癌患者长期生存结局的影响:一项使用倾向评分匹配的大型病例对照研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1239-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
The effect of extended lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃腺癌患者生存率的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jul;181(1):56-64.
5
Does extended lymphadenectomy influence prognosis of gastric carcinoma after curative resection?扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃癌根治性切除术后的预后有影响吗?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Sep-Oct;47(35):1470-4.
6
Impact of histopathology on the outcome of D1/D2 gastrectomies with R0 resection.病理组织学对 R0 切除的 D1/D2 胃切除术结果的影响。
Digestion. 2012;86(1):67-73. doi: 10.1159/000338298. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
7
[Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: can the type of lymphadenectomy condition the long-term results?].[胃癌全胃切除术:淋巴结清扫类型会影响长期疗效吗?]
Suppl Tumori. 2005 May-Jun;4(3):S84-5.
8
[Clinical value of superior mesenteric vein (No.14v) lymph node dissection in D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced distal gastric cancer].[肠系膜上静脉(第14v组)淋巴结清扫在局部进展期远端胃癌D2根治性胃切除术中的临床价值]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;21(10):1136-1141.
9
Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial.胃癌的外科治疗:随机全国性荷兰 D1D2 试验的 15 年随访结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 May;11(5):439-49. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
10
Resection for gastric cancer in the community.社区胃癌切除术
Semin Oncol. 2005 Dec;32(6 Suppl 9):S90-3. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年胃癌患者的选择性淋巴结清扫:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):7678. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247678.
2
A retrospective study comparing D1 limited lymph node dissection and D2 extended lymph node dissection for N3 gastric cancer.一项比较D1局限性淋巴结清扫术与D2扩大淋巴结清扫术治疗N3期胃癌的回顾性研究。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(4):2259-2266. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.42.
3
Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy: an Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials for Short-Term Outcomes.腹腔镜与开放胃切除术:短期结局随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;12(3):587-597. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01396-4. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
The efficacy of clinical pathway in gastric cancer surgery.临床路径在胃癌手术中的疗效。
Turk J Surg. 2020 Mar 18;36(1):39-47. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4547. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.基于解剖部位的淋巴结分期系统优于第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会分期系统,适用于接受手术切除、组织学低级别胃癌的患者:单机构经验。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211836. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of gastric cancer resections performed in a high volume community cancer center.在一家大型社区癌症中心进行的胃癌切除术的结果。
Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;24(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
2
The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery.癌症中心在使用淋巴结计数作为胃癌手术质量衡量标准时的作用。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):37-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.678.
3
Long term follow up and retrospective study on 533 gastric cancer cases.533例胃癌病例的长期随访及回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2014 May 16;14:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-29.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of extended lymphadenectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer.系统评价和荟萃分析可切除胃癌患者扩大淋巴结清扫术的有效性和安全性。
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):595-604. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9497. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
5
Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer.随机对照临床试验比较胃癌行 D1 或 D2 胃切除术的生存情况。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):23-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9345.
6
Treatment results of curative gastric resection from a specialist Australian unit: low volume with satisfactory outcomes.澳大利亚某专业医疗单位的根治性胃切除术治疗结果:手术量少,但疗效满意。
Gastric Cancer. 2014 Jan;17(1):152-60. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0240-3. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
7
Outcomes among patients treated for gastric adenocarcinoma during the last decade.近十年胃腺癌患者的治疗结果。
J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;107(7):752-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.23320. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.欧洲各地食管癌和胃癌手术结果的差异。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):83-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8966. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
9
Comparisons of Gastric Cancer Treatments: East vs. West.胃癌治疗的比较:东西方的比较。
J Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jun;12(2):55-62. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2012.12.2.55. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Impact of histopathology on the outcome of D1/D2 gastrectomies with R0 resection.病理组织学对 R0 切除的 D1/D2 胃切除术结果的影响。
Digestion. 2012;86(1):67-73. doi: 10.1159/000338298. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

II-III期胃癌行D1和D2淋巴结清扫及R0切除后的生存结果:单中心纵向随访

Survival outcomes after D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy with R0 resection in stage II-III gastric cancer: Longitudinal follow-up in a single center.

作者信息

Uslu Adam, Zengel Baha, İlhan Enver, Aykas Ahmet, Şimşek Cenk, Üreyen Orhan, Duran Ali, Okut Gökalp

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Surg. 2018 Jul 1;34(2):125-130. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.3846. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.3846
PMID:30023977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6048646/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

D2 lymphadenectomy (D2-LND) with curative resection (R0) is the cornerstone of gastric cancer treatment. In this study, we compared survival outcomes of D2-LDN with D1-LDN in patients who had undergone curative resection for Stages II and III primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between April 1996 and March 2014, 153 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach underwent total gastrectomy with D1-LND or D2-LND. Among those, 118 patients (38 D1 vs. 80 D2) with a complete history and having been followed for at least 1 year after surgery were enrolled. Both groups were compared in terms of demographic and clinico-pathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 42.6±52.5 months (mo.). The demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. The Tumor, Node and Metastases (TNM) stage distribution was 25% for Stage II and 75% for Stage III for both groups. Eighteen patients (47.4%) in the D1 and 47 patients (58.8%) in the D2 group were free from locoregional recurrence. The median disease-free survival was 22.0±4.1 mo. for the D1 and 28.0±4.3 mo. for the D2 group (p=0.36). Eight patients (21%) in the D1 and 39 patients (49%) in the D2 group were alive at the last follow-up. The median overall survival (OS) was 22.0±3.7 mo. for the D1 and 31.0±5.4 mo. for the D2 group (p=0.13). The 5-year disease-free survival and OS by the Kaplan-Meier estimates were 41% vs. 51% and 30% vs. 42% in the D1 and D2 groups, respectively. The median 5-year OS for patients with Stages IIIB and IIIC tumors was 14.0±2.2 mo. for the D1 and 20.0±5.0 mo. for the D2 group, respectively (p: 0.048).

CONCLUSION

When compared to D1-LND, D2-LND with R0 resection have yielded a trend toward a better outcome in patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

摘要

目的

根治性切除(R0)的D2淋巴结清扫术(D2-LND)是胃癌治疗的基石。在本研究中,我们比较了接受II期和III期原发性胃腺癌根治性切除的患者中D2-LND与D1-LND的生存结果。

材料与方法

1996年4月至2014年3月期间,153例连续性胃腺癌患者接受了D1-LND或D2-LND的全胃切除术。其中,118例有完整病史且术后至少随访1年的患者(38例D1组 vs. 80例D2组)被纳入研究。比较两组患者的人口统计学和临床病理特征。

结果

平均随访时间为42.6±52.5个月(月)。两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。两组患者的肿瘤、淋巴结和转移(TNM)分期分布均为II期占25%,III期占75%。D1组18例患者(47.4%)和D2组47例患者(58.8%)无局部区域复发。D1组的无病生存期中位数为22.0±4.1个月,D2组为28.0±4.3个月(p = 0.36)。D1组8例患者(21%)和D2组39例患者(49%)在最后一次随访时仍存活。D1组的总生存期(OS)中位数为22.0±3.7个月,D2组为31.0±5.4个月(p = 0.13)。根据Kaplan-Meier估计,D1组和D2组的5年无病生存率分别为41%和51%,5年总生存率分别为30%和42%。IIIB期和IIIC期肿瘤患者的5年总生存期中位数,D1组为14.0±2.2个月,D2组为20.0±5.0个月(p:0.048)。

结论

与D1-LND相比,R0切除的D2-LND在原发性胃腺癌患者中显示出预后更好的趋势。