Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Nov;30(11):1734-1748. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01311. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
It is a core cognitive ability of humans to represent and reason about relational information, such as "the train station is north of the hotel" or "Charles is richer than Jim." However, the neural processes underlying the ability to draw conclusions about relations are still not sufficiently understood. Central open questions are as follows: (1) What are the neural correlates of relational reasoning? (2) Where can deductive and inductive reasoning be localized? (3) What is the impact of different informational types on cerebral activity? For that, we conducted a meta-analysis of 47 neuroimaging studies. We found activation of the frontoparietal network during both deductive and inductive reasoning, with additional activation in an extended network during inductive reasoning in the basal ganglia and the inferior parietal cortex. Analyses revealed a double dissociation concerning the lateral and medial Brodmann's area 6 during deductive and inductive reasoning, indicating differences in terms of processing verbal information in deductive and spatial information in inductive tasks. During semantic and symbolic tasks, the frontoparietal network was found active, whereas geometric tasks only elicited prefrontal activation, which can be explained by the reduced demand for the construction of a mental representation in geometric tasks. Our study provides new insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying relational reasoning and clarifies previous controversies concerning involved brain areas.
人类具有表示和推理关系信息的核心认知能力,例如“火车站在酒店的北边”或“查尔斯比吉姆富有”。然而,关于推理关系的神经过程仍然没有得到充分的理解。以下是一些核心问题:(1)关系推理的神经关联是什么?(2)演绎推理和归纳推理在哪里定位?(3)不同信息类型对大脑活动的影响是什么?为此,我们对 47 项神经影像学研究进行了荟萃分析。我们发现,无论是演绎推理还是归纳推理,都激活了额顶网络,而在归纳推理中,基底神经节和下顶叶皮层的扩展网络也有额外的激活。分析表明,在演绎和归纳推理中,大脑外侧和内侧的 Brodmann 区 6 存在双重分离,这表明在演绎任务中处理言语信息和在归纳任务中处理空间信息存在差异。在语义和符号任务中,发现额顶网络活跃,而在几何任务中仅激活前额叶,这可以用在几何任务中构建心理表象的需求减少来解释。我们的研究为关系推理的认知机制提供了新的见解,并澄清了先前关于涉及脑区的争议。