Wan Xinjian, Chen Sumin, Zhao Qiuyan, Li Tian, Luo Shengzheng, Cai Xiaobo, Ren Yingchun, Yu Lanting, Li Baiwen
Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Weihai, China.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov-Dec;24(6):348-354. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_94_18.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although endoscopic metal biliary endoprosthesis (EMBE) is widely accepted as the most suitable drainage method for patients with unresectable malignant obstruction, uncontrolled post-procedural cholangitis is still a problem. We aimed to validate a new treatment modality to prevent post-ERCP cholangitis in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.
A total of 378 patients who were diagnosed with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction and underwent EMBE or temporary endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) following EMBE placement, from January 2010 to July 2016, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Incidence of cholangitis, related infectious indicators, success rate of biliary drainage, and occurrence of complications were evaluated.
The risk of overall cholangitis and related infectious indicators was significantly lower in EMBE plus ENBD group than that in EMBE group. The occurrence of cholangitis was 2.4% versus 11.9% (P = 0.004). On further analysis of subgroups, although no difference was detected in nonhilar cholangiocarcinoma subgroup, the incidence of cholangitis and related infectious indicators in hilar cholangiocarcinoma subgroup with EMBE modality were distinctly higher than that with EMBE plus ENBD modality (type I + II was 18.5% vs 0%, P < 0.05; type III + IV was 19.8% vs 3.8%, P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in successful biliary drainage rate and procedure-related complications when all subgroups were compared.
The temporary placement of ENBD following EMBE is a simple and effective treatment modality to prevent post-ERCP cholangitis, especially in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
背景/目的:尽管内镜金属胆道内支架置入术(EMBE)被广泛认为是不可切除恶性梗阻患者最合适的引流方法,但术后胆管炎控制不佳仍是一个问题。我们旨在验证一种新的治疗方式,以预防不可切除胆管癌患者ERCP术后胆管炎。
本回顾性研究纳入了2010年1月至2016年7月期间共378例被诊断为不可切除恶性胆道梗阻且接受了EMBE或EMBE置入术后临时内镜鼻胆管引流(ENBD)的患者。评估胆管炎的发生率、相关感染指标、胆道引流成功率及并发症的发生情况。
EMBE联合ENBD组的总体胆管炎风险及相关感染指标显著低于EMBE组。胆管炎的发生率分别为2.4%和11.9%(P = 〇.〇〇4)。在亚组进一步分析中,尽管在非肝门部胆管癌亚组中未检测到差异,但EMBE方式的肝门部胆管癌亚组胆管炎及相关感染指标的发生率明显高于EMBE联合ENBD方式(I + II型为18.5%对0%,P < 0.05;III + IV型为19.8%对3.8%,P < 0.05)。比较所有亚组时,胆道引流成功率及手术相关并发症方面未发现显著差异。
EMBE术后临时置入ENBD是预防ERCP术后胆管炎的一种简单有效的治疗方式,尤其是对于肝门部胆管癌患者。