Suppr超能文献

恶性胆道梗阻患者的胆道支架置入:双层支架、塑料支架和金属支架的比较。

Biliary stenting in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: comparison of double layer, plastic and metal stents.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and School of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Jul;58(7):2088-92. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2607-z. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The double layer stent (DLS) has a unique design and has been used for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction, but literature on this stent is limited. Our aim was to compare plastic (PS), DLS and metal stents (MS) in terms of complication rates, time to occlusion, and patency rate in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

METHODS

A retrospective review of stents placed for MBO at our institution in the period between January 2009 and April 2011 was conducted. A total of 114 stents were identified, of which 44 were MS (39 %), 37 DLS (32 %), and 33 PS (29 %). A stent was considered occluded when an unplanned stent removal or intervention occurred due to clinical suspicion of biliary obstruction.

RESULTS

Stents remained patent for 95 days (range 7-359 days) in the DLS group and 59 days (range 7-228 days) in the PS group (P = 0.014) and 128.7 days (range 4-602 days) in the metal stent group. Twenty-seven percent (n = 9) of PS occluded after a mean of 60 days while 16 % (n = 7) of MS occluded after a mean of 87 days and 5 % (n = 2) of DLS occluded after a mean of 85 days (DLS vs. PS P = 0.012, DLS vs. MS P = 0.13, MS vs. PS P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

DLS are superior to PS in patients with MBO and appear to be comparable to MS. MS had a longer patency rate but were comparable to DLS in early and late complications. We speculate that the less expensive DLS may be a cost effective alternative in the palliation of MBO.

摘要

背景与目的

双层支架(DLS)具有独特的设计,已被用于恶性胆道梗阻的姑息治疗,但关于该支架的文献有限。我们的目的是比较塑料(PS)、DLS 和金属支架(MS)在恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)患者中的并发症发生率、闭塞时间和通畅率。

方法

对 2009 年 1 月至 2011 年 4 月期间在我院放置的 MBO 支架进行回顾性分析。共确定 114 个支架,其中 MS 44 个(39%)、DLS 37 个(32%)和 PS 33 个(29%)。当由于临床怀疑胆道梗阻而计划外取出或干预支架时,认为支架闭塞。

结果

DLS 组支架通畅时间为 95 天(7-359 天),PS 组为 59 天(7-228 天)(P = 0.014),MS 组为 128.7 天(4-602 天)。PS 组中有 27%(n = 9)在平均 60 天后闭塞,MS 组中有 16%(n = 7)在平均 87 天后闭塞,DLS 组中有 5%(n = 2)在平均 85 天后闭塞(DLS 与 PS 比较,P = 0.012,DLS 与 MS 比较,P = 0.13,MS 与 PS 比较,P = 0.22)。

结论

DLS 在 MBO 患者中优于 PS,且与 MS 相当。MS 具有更长的通畅率,但在早期和晚期并发症方面与 DLS 相当。我们推测,更便宜的 DLS 可能是 MBO 姑息治疗的一种具有成本效益的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验