Department of Nanotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Chemistry, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 1113658639, Iran.
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018 Dec 1;531:245-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
It is now being increasingly accepted that cells in their native tissue show different morphologies than those grown on a culture plate. Culturing cells on the conventional two-dimensional (2D) culture plates does not closely resemble the in vivo three-dimensional (3D) structure of cells which in turn seems to affect cellular function. This is one of the reasons, among many others, that nanoparticles uptake and toxicology data from 2D culture plates and in vivo environments are not correlated with one another. In this study, we offer a novel platform technology for producing more in vivo-like models of in vitro cell culture.
The normal fibroblast cells (HU02) were cultured on "pseudo-3D" substrates, made from cell imprinting approach. The respond of the cells to a model nanoparticle (gold nanorod) were compared in 2D and "pseudo-3D" cultures modes, by cytotoxicological assays.
It is illustrated here that the cells' respond to the exact same type of nanoparticles is majorly dependant in their shape. The use of "pseudo-3D" substrates which could partially mimic the shape of cells in vivo is strongly proposed as a means of better predicting the efficacy of the 2D cell culture plates.
现在越来越多的人认为,细胞在其天然组织中表现出的形态与在培养板上生长的形态不同。在传统的二维(2D)培养板上培养细胞,与细胞在体内的三维(3D)结构并不相似,而这似乎会影响细胞功能。这就是为什么纳米颗粒在 2D 培养板和体内环境中的摄取和毒理学数据彼此不相关的原因之一。在这项研究中,我们提供了一种新颖的平台技术,用于生产更接近体内细胞培养的体外模型。
正常成纤维细胞(HU02)在“伪 3D”基质上培养,该基质采用细胞压印方法制成。通过细胞毒性测定,在 2D 和“伪 3D”培养模式下比较了细胞对模型纳米颗粒(金纳米棒)的反应。
这里说明的是,细胞对完全相同类型的纳米颗粒的反应主要取决于它们的形状。强烈建议使用可以部分模拟体内细胞形状的“伪 3D”基质作为更好地预测 2D 细胞培养板功效的一种手段。