Suppr超能文献

为有起搏器或植入式心律转复除颤器的患者进行磁共振成像检查需要专业技术。

[MRI in patients with a pacemaker or ICD requires expertise].

作者信息

Götte Marco J W, Allaart Cornelis P

机构信息

VUmc, afd. Cardiologie, Amsterdam.

Contact: M.J.W. Götte (

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018 Jun 18;162:D2910.

Abstract

Nazarian et al. recently studied the safety of magnetic resonance imaging in a large cohort of patients with cardiac devices not considered to be MRI-conditional (termed a "legacy" device). More than 2100 thoracic and nonthoracic MRI examinations were performed in 1509 patients. It was found that with appropriate precautions, including a prespecified safety protocol, no long-term clinically significant adverse events occurred. It could easily be concluded from these observations that MRI can now be considered "safe" in this category of patients. Whether such a conclusion is justified, is questionable however. Although not life-threatening, interactions between MRI and devices still occur and clinical consequences remain unpredictable. It is therefore strongly recommended that MRI in patients with a legacy device should exclusively be performed in centres of excellence. Only in the presence of a multidisciplinary radiological and cardiac expert team can MRI be conducted with acceptable risks in patients with a legacy device.

摘要

纳扎里安等人最近在一大群使用非磁共振成像(MRI)条件适用型心脏设备(即“传统”设备)的患者中研究了MRI的安全性。对1509名患者进行了2100多次胸部和非胸部MRI检查。结果发现,采取适当的预防措施,包括预先制定的安全方案后,未发生长期具有临床意义的不良事件。从这些观察结果很容易得出结论,即现在可以认为MRI对这类患者“安全”。然而,这样的结论是否合理,是值得怀疑的。虽然MRI与设备之间的相互作用不会危及生命,但仍会发生,且临床后果仍然不可预测。因此,强烈建议,对使用传统设备的患者进行MRI检查应仅在卓越中心进行。只有在多学科放射学和心脏专家团队在场的情况下,才能在使用传统设备的患者中进行MRI检查,且风险可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验