Rashid Faisal, Barron Ian
a Center for International Education , College of Education, University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA.
J Child Sex Abus. 2018 Oct;27(7):778-792. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2018.1491916. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
Debates in international forums and in mainstream media on the role, responsibility, liability, and response of ecclesiastical authorities of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) toward clerical child sexual abuse (cCSA) fail to take into account the historical roots and awareness of the problem. Reports also fail to mention the historic organizational laws RCC developed over centuries. In contrast, RCC documents evidence that the Catholic Church not only carried century's old history of cCSA, but also repeatedly condemned cCSA by successive papal authorities, organizational laws, and institutional management mechanisms. During the first millennium, however, church laws remained confined to the bookshelves and were not converted into appropriate management policies and infrastructural models. This was largely due to the absence of a central administrative organizational structure, which developed later in the 12th century, following the Second Council of Lateran (1139) when the Papacy asserted its authority to establish administrative control over the organizational church. It was only then that management policies started to be framed and institutional structures enacted to deal more appropriately with cCSA from the 14th to 20th centuries. Despite this, RCC developed a culture of secrecy using clandestine organizational management models and institutional laws prescribed in 1568, 1622, 1741, 1866, 1922, and 1962 which aimed to manage cCSA. The current study traces reported cCSA as far back as the first century and critically examines the organizational laws, and institutional policies developed by RCC to address clerical sexual misconduct up to the end of the 19th century.
国际论坛和主流媒体就罗马天主教会(RCC)的教会当局对神职人员性虐待儿童(cCSA)问题的角色、责任、义务及应对措施展开的辩论,未能考虑到该问题的历史根源和认知情况。相关报道也未提及天主教会历经数百年制定的历史性组织法规。相比之下,天主教会的文件证明,天主教会不仅有着长达数个世纪的神职人员性虐待儿童的历史,而且历代教皇当局、组织法规及制度管理机制也一再谴责神职人员性虐待儿童行为。然而,在第一个千年里,教会法规一直束之高阁,未能转化为适当的管理政策和基础设施模式。这主要是由于缺乏中央行政组织结构,这种结构在12世纪后期拉特兰第二次会议(1139年)之后才得以发展,当时教皇宣称有权对教会组织建立行政控制。直到那时,才开始制定管理政策并建立制度结构,以便在14世纪至20世纪更妥善地处理神职人员性虐待儿童问题。尽管如此,天主教会利用1568年、1622年、1741年、1866年、1922年和1962年规定的秘密组织管理模式和制度法规,形成了一种保密文化,旨在管理神职人员性虐待儿童问题。本研究将有记录的神职人员性虐待儿童问题追溯到公元一世纪,并批判性地审视了天主教会为解决神职人员不当性行为问题而制定的组织法规和制度政策,直至19世纪末。