Suppr超能文献

为何在其他非天主教基督教教派和宗教中,神职人员对儿童的性虐待问题主要仍聚焦于天主教会。

Why the Focus of Clerical Child Sexual Abuse has Largely Remained on the Catholic Church amongst Other Non-Catholic Christian Denominations and Religions.

作者信息

Rashid Faisal, Barron Ian

机构信息

a Federal Banking Ombudsman Pakistan , Karachi , Pakistan.

b University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA , USA.

出版信息

J Child Sex Abus. 2019 Jul;28(5):564-585. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2018.1563261. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

Abstract

The current study considers reasons for the consistent focus of academic research and mainstream media on clerical child sexual abuse (cCSA) largely within the Roman Catholic Church, seeming to ignore cCSA in other Christian denominations and religions. This study includes an analysis of traditional mainstream media and case reports on cCSA in non-Catholic churches and other religious faiths. The authors highlight the inadequacy of research and identify a wide range of gaps in this so far neglected area. Commonalities of cCSA and institutional responses are identified across denominations and religions, and reasons for the apparent over focus on the Catholic Church are discussed. The mains potential reasons identified were: (a) the centralized nature of the Church's universal organizational stature and management structure; (b) the anti-Catholic political and media bias in Protestant-dominated developed countries; (c) secular legal systems with access to powerful lawyers and insurance companies to locate responsibility at organizational level in order to seek compensation and finally; (d) the organized institutional power exercisable by respective bishops to silence victims. Future research needs to move beyond analysis of existing academic literature, press, and case review reports to comparative empirical studies across denominations and religions.

摘要

当前的研究探讨了学术研究和主流媒体一直聚焦于罗马天主教会内部神职人员对儿童的性虐待(cCSA)的原因,而似乎忽视了其他基督教教派和宗教中的此类现象。本研究包括对传统主流媒体以及非天主教教会和其他宗教信仰中cCSA案例报告的分析。作者强调了研究的不足,并指出在这个迄今为止被忽视的领域存在广泛的差距。研究确定了不同教派和宗教中cCSA及机构应对措施的共性,并讨论了明显过度关注天主教会的原因。确定的主要潜在原因包括:(a)教会普遍的组织地位和管理结构的集中性质;(b)新教主导的发达国家中存在的反天主教政治和媒体偏见;(c)世俗法律体系,有强大的律师和保险公司介入,以便在组织层面确定责任以寻求赔偿;最后(d)各自主教能够行使有组织的机构权力来压制受害者。未来的研究需要超越对现有学术文献、新闻报道和案例审查报告的分析,转向跨教派和宗教的比较实证研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验