Molecular Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Departments of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4516-1.
Controversy exists for the use of Ki67 protein expression as a predictive marker to select patients who do or do not derive benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Whether other proliferation markers, like Cyclin D1, and mitotic count can also be used to identify those estrogen receptor α (ERα) positive breast cancer patients that derive benefit from tamoxifen is not well established. We tested the predictive value of these markers for tamoxifen benefit in ERα positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients.
We collected primary tumor blocks from 563 ERα positive patients who had been randomized between tamoxifen (1 to 3 years) vs. no adjuvant therapy (IKA trial) with a median follow-up of 7.8 years. Mitotic count, Ki67 and Cyclin D1 protein expression were centrally assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. In addition, we tested the predictive value of CCND1 gene copy number variation using MLPA technology. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models including interaction between marker and treatment were used to test the predictive value of these markers.
Patients with high Ki67 (≥5%) as well as low (< 5%) expressing tumors equally benefitted from adjuvant tamoxifen (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.5 for both groups)(p for interaction 0.97). We did not observe a significant interaction between either Cyclin D1 or Ki67 and tamoxifen, indicating that the relative benefit from tamoxifen was not dependent on the level of these markers. Patients with tumors with low mitotic count derived substantial benefit from tamoxifen (adjusted HR 0.24, p < 0.0001), while patients with tumors with high mitotic count derived no significant benefit (adjusted HR 0.64, p = 0.14) (p for interaction 0.03).
Postmenopausal breast cancer patients with high Ki67 counts do significantly benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen, while those with high mitotic count do not. Mitotic count is a better selection marker for reduced tamoxifen benefit than Ki67.
Ki67 蛋白表达作为预测标志物,用于选择接受辅助内分泌治疗是否获益的患者,目前仍存在争议。其他增殖标志物,如细胞周期蛋白 D1 和有丝分裂计数,是否也可用于确定那些从他莫昔芬中获益的雌激素受体 α(ERα)阳性乳腺癌患者,目前尚未得到充分证实。我们检测了这些标志物对 ERα 阳性绝经后乳腺癌患者接受他莫昔芬治疗获益的预测价值。
我们收集了 563 例 ERα 阳性患者的原发性肿瘤组织块,这些患者被随机分配至他莫昔芬(1-3 年)组或无辅助治疗组(IKA 试验),中位随访 7.8 年。采用免疫组化方法在组织微阵列上对有丝分裂计数、Ki67 和细胞周期蛋白 D1 蛋白表达进行中心评估。此外,我们还使用 MLPA 技术检测了 CCND1 基因拷贝数变异的预测价值。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型,包括标记物与治疗之间的交互作用,检测这些标记物的预测价值。
Ki67 高表达(≥5%)和低表达(<5%)的患者同样从辅助他莫昔芬治疗中获益(两组调整后的危险比(HR)均为 0.5)(交互作用的 p 值为 0.97)。我们未观察到 Cyclin D1 或 Ki67 与他莫昔芬之间存在显著的交互作用,表明他莫昔芬的相对获益不依赖于这些标志物的水平。有丝分裂计数低的肿瘤患者从他莫昔芬治疗中获得显著获益(调整后的 HR 为 0.24,p<0.0001),而有丝分裂计数高的患者则未获得显著获益(调整后的 HR 为 0.64,p=0.14)(交互作用的 p 值为 0.03)。
高 Ki67 计数的绝经后乳腺癌患者从辅助他莫昔芬治疗中显著获益,而高有丝分裂计数的患者则无获益。有丝分裂计数是预测他莫昔芬获益减少的更好选择标志物,优于 Ki67。