Godsmark Christie N, Tipton Michael J, Dennis Michael R, House James R
a Extreme Environments Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science , University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth , United Kingdom.
b Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down , Salisbury , United Kingdom.
Ergonomics. 2018 Dec;61(12):1635-1645. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1503726.
Working in Chemical Biological (CB) protective equipment causes thermoregulatory strain by restricting evaporative cooling. We quantified which impermeable ancillary items [gloves(G), body armour liner(BAL), respirator(R) and overboots(OB)] imposed the greatest and the least thermoregulatory strain through restricting evaporative cooling. The study was a five-condition repeated-measures design with male volunteers (n = 13) who stepped intermittently with recovery periods in a desert-like environment (40.5 °C, 20% rh). Conditions varied in the ensemble worn, with a matched weight secured to the area when an item was not worn: CON(CB suit plus all items), N(no R), N(no BAL [170g liner]), N(no G) and N(no OB). The greatest reduction in thermoregulatory strain compared with CON occurred in N when the rise of rectal temperature was attenuated by 0.37 °C.hr (p < .001), extending tolerance time by 21.3% (p < .05) and improving perceived thermal comfort. The least improvement occurred for N. It is recommended that the G permeability be examined further. Practitioner summary: Thermoregulatory strain was quantified when wearing impermeable protective equipment. The thermal burden of intermittent exercise in desert-like environments was best alleviated by removing gloves compared to removing a respirator, overboots or body armour liner. Reducing the evaporative resistance of materials used for such kit, particularly gloves, should be investigated.
穿着化学生物(CB)防护装备会因限制蒸发散热而导致体温调节压力。我们量化了哪些不可渗透的辅助物品[手套(G)、防弹衣内衬(BAL)、呼吸器(R)和高腰靴(OB)]通过限制蒸发散热造成的体温调节压力最大和最小。该研究采用五条件重复测量设计,男性志愿者(n = 13)在类似沙漠的环境(40.5°C,20%相对湿度)中间歇性行走并设有恢复期。所穿的套装组合不同,当不穿戴某一物品时,在相应部位固定相同重量的物品:CON(CB套装加所有物品)、N(不戴R)、N(不戴BAL[170克内衬])、N(不戴G)和N(不穿OB)。与CON相比,N组的体温调节压力降低最大,直肠温度上升减缓了0.37°C·小时(p <.001),耐受时间延长了21.3%(p <.05),并改善了热舒适度。N组的改善最小。建议进一步研究手套的透气性。从业者总结:对穿着不可渗透防护装备时的体温调节压力进行了量化。在类似沙漠的环境中进行间歇性运动时,与摘下呼吸器、高腰靴或防弹衣内衬相比,摘下手套最能减轻热负担。应研究降低此类装备所用材料,尤其是手套的蒸发阻力。