Kintigh Jeremy, Monagle Paul, Ignjatovic Vera
Haematology Research Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Department of Paediatrics University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct 16;2(1):42-48. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12048. eCollection 2018 Jan.
Currently there are three commercially available thrombin generation methods. These methods help detect the levels of thrombin generated in patient samples by the use of chromogenic or fluorogenic substrates in plasma or whole blood. Determining the rate of thrombin generation can help indicate if patients are at risk of clotting or bleeding. This review discusses two fluorogenic and one chromogenic method and focuses on similarities and differences of these three methods. The review specifically focuses on the accuracy of commercial substrates used in thrombin generation, and interference that can occur by various plasma proteins, as well as on evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The commercial chromogenic assay and both fluorogenic assays are able to monitor the rate of thrombin generation and can give indications towards potential coagulation abnormalities. Overall, the main differences between the thrombin generation methods are based on the type of substrate used, sample preparation, and data processing. Despite advancement in this field there are still technical challenges that preclude the widespread use of thrombin generation in clinical applications.
目前有三种可商购的凝血酶生成方法。这些方法通过在血浆或全血中使用显色或荧光底物来帮助检测患者样本中生成的凝血酶水平。确定凝血酶生成速率有助于指示患者是否有凝血或出血风险。本综述讨论了两种荧光法和一种显色法,并着重于这三种方法的异同。该综述特别关注用于凝血酶生成的商业底物的准确性、各种血浆蛋白可能产生的干扰,以及评估每种方法的优缺点。商业显色测定法和两种荧光测定法都能够监测凝血酶生成速率,并能指示潜在的凝血异常。总体而言,凝血酶生成方法之间的主要差异基于所用底物的类型、样本制备和数据处理。尽管该领域取得了进展,但仍存在技术挑战,阻碍了凝血酶生成在临床应用中的广泛使用。