Tokushige Shin-Ichi, Terao Yasuo, Matsuda Shunichi, Furubayashi Toshiaki, Sasaki Takuya, Inomata-Terada Satomi, Yugeta Akihiro, Hamada Masashi, Tsuji Shoji, Ugawa Yoshikazu
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cell Physiology, Kyorin University, Mitaka, Japan.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 11;9:1178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01178. eCollection 2018.
The rhythm of the internal clock is considered to be determined by the basal ganglia, with some studies suggesting slower internal clock in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, patients may also show motor hastening when they walk (festination) or are engaged in repetitive tapping, indicating faster ticking of the internal clock. Is the internal clock slower or faster in PD? The purpose of this study was to answer this question, i.e., how fast and slow a rhythm they can synchronize with, especially with reference to the limit of sensorimotor synchronization or temporal integration, representing the threshold of slower pace they can entrain into their motor actions, which is known to lie between 2 and 3 s in normal subjects but not yet studied in PD. We employed a synchronized tapping task that required subjects to tap the key in synchrony with repetitive tones at fixed interstimulus intervals (ISI) between 200 and 4800 ms. Twenty normal subjects and sixteen PD patients were enrolled, who were classified into early and advanced PD groups by UPDRS-III (early: 15 or less, advanced: more than 15). The ISI at which the response changes from synchronizing with the tones to lagging behind them was considered to be the limit of temporal integration. Early PD patients responded ahead of the tones (negative asynchrony), which became more apparent with repeated tapping. This suggested "faster" ticking clock even in the presence of the pacing tones. In normal subjects, the limit of temporal integration was around 2-3 s: below this, subjects could synchronize with the tones, while above it they had difficulty in synchronization. In early PD patients, the limit of temporal integration was significantly longer than in normal subjects, pointing to their enhanced ability to synchronize also with slower paces of tones, but advanced PD patients had significantly shortened limits, suggesting that advanced patients lost this ability. In conclusion, the limit of temporal integration is initially longer but gets shorter as the disease progresses. It can be explained by the hastening of the internal clock at the earlier stages of PD, followed by the loss of temporal integration.
内部时钟的节律被认为是由基底神经节决定的,一些研究表明帕金森病(PD)患者的内部时钟较慢。然而,患者在行走(慌张步态)或进行重复敲击时也可能表现出运动加速,这表明内部时钟的滴答速度更快。PD患者的内部时钟是慢还是快?本研究的目的是回答这个问题,即他们能够与多快和多慢的节律同步,特别是参考感觉运动同步或时间整合的极限,这代表了他们能够纳入其运动动作的较慢节奏的阈值,已知正常受试者的该阈值在2至3秒之间,但PD患者尚未进行研究。我们采用了一种同步敲击任务,要求受试者在200至4800毫秒的固定刺激间隔(ISI)下与重复的音调同步敲击按键。招募了20名正常受试者和16名PD患者,根据统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(UPDRS-III)将他们分为早期和晚期PD组(早期:15分及以下,晚期:超过15分)。响应从与音调同步变为落后于音调的ISI被认为是时间整合的极限。早期PD患者在音调之前做出反应(负异步),随着重复敲击,这种现象变得更加明显。这表明即使存在起搏音调,时钟的滴答速度也“更快”。在正常受试者中,时间整合的极限约为2至3秒:低于此值,受试者可以与音调同步,而高于此值则同步困难。在早期PD患者中,时间整合的极限明显长于正常受试者,表明他们也能够与较慢的音调节奏同步,但晚期PD患者的极限明显缩短,这表明晚期患者失去了这种能力。总之,时间整合的极限最初较长,但随着疾病进展会缩短。这可以通过PD早期阶段内部时钟的加速,随后是时间整合的丧失来解释。