Marcus Roy P, Morris Jonathan M, Matsumoto Jane M, Alexander Amy E, Halaweish Ahmed F, Kelly James A, Fletcher Joel G, McCollough Cynthia H, Leng Shuai
1Department of Radiology, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.
2Siemens Healthineers, 40 Liberty Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355 USA.
3D Print Med. 2017;3(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41205-017-0013-4. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
To assess the impact of metal artifact reduction techniques in 3D printing by evaluating image quality and segmentation time in both phantom and patient studies with dental restorations and/or other metal implants. An acrylic denture apparatus (Kilgore Typodent, Kilgore International, Coldwater, MI) was set in a 20 cm water phantom and scanned on a single-source CT scanner with gantry tilting capacity (SOMATOM Edge, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) under 5 scenerios: (1) Baseline acquisition at 120 kV with no gantry tilt, no jaw spacer, (2) acquisition at 140 kV, (3) acquisition with a gantry tilt at 15°, (4) acquisition with a non-radiopaque jaw spacer and (5) acquisition with a jaw spacer and a gantry tilt at 15°. All acquisitions were reconstructed both with and without a dedicated iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (MAR). Patients referred for a head-and-neck exam were included into the study. Acquisitions were performed on the same scanner with 120 kV and the images were reconstructed with and without iterative MAR. Segmentation was performed on a dedicated workstation (Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control Systems; Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) to quantify volume of metal artifact and segmentation time.
In the phantom study, the use of gantry tilt, jaw spacer and increased tube voltage showed no benefit in time or artifact volume reduction. However the jaw spacer allowed easier separation of the upper and lower jaw and a better display of the teeth. The use of dedicated iterative MAR significantly reduced the metal artifact volume and processing time. Same observations were made for the four patients included into the study.
The use of dedicated iterative MAR and jaw spacer substantially reduced metal artifacts in the head-and-neck CT acquisitions, hence allowing a faster 3D segmentation workflow.
通过在带有牙齿修复体和/或其他金属植入物的体模和患者研究中评估图像质量和分割时间,来评估金属伪影减少技术在3D打印中的影响。将一个丙烯酸假牙装置(Kilgore Typodent,Kilgore International,Coldwater,密歇根州)放置在一个20厘米的水体模中,并在一台具有机架倾斜功能的单源CT扫描仪(SOMATOM Edge,西门子医疗,德国福希海姆)上进行扫描,扫描条件如下:(1)在120 kV下进行基线采集,机架不倾斜,不使用颌垫;(2)在140 kV下采集;(3)机架倾斜15°采集;(4)使用非放射性颌垫采集;(5)使用颌垫且机架倾斜15°采集。所有采集均使用和不使用专用迭代金属伪影减少算法(MAR)进行重建。纳入了因头颈部检查而转诊的患者。在同一台扫描仪上以120 kV进行采集,并使用和不使用迭代MAR进行图像重建。在专用工作站(Materialise交互式医学图像控制系统;Materialise NV,比利时鲁汶)上进行分割,以量化金属伪影的体积和分割时间。
在体模研究中,使用机架倾斜、颌垫和提高管电压在减少时间或伪影体积方面没有益处。然而,颌垫使上下颌更容易分离,牙齿显示得更好。使用专用迭代MAR显著减少了金属伪影的体积和处理时间。对纳入研究的四名患者也有相同的观察结果。
使用专用迭代MAR和颌垫可大幅减少头颈部CT采集中的金属伪影,从而实现更快的3D分割工作流程。