Suppr超能文献

中药与药物性过敏反应:来自北京药物警戒数据库的数据

Traditional Chinese medicine and drug-induced anaphylaxis: data from the Beijing pharmacovigilance database.

作者信息

Li Xiaotong, Thai Sydney, Lu Wenchao, Sun Shusen, Tang Huilin, Zhai Suodi, Wang Tiansheng

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Rd Huayuan #49, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.

Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Aug;40(4):921-927. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0699-4. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

Abstract

Background Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is one of the major triggers for drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA). Objective We aimed to use the Beijing pharmacovigilance database (BPD) to analyze TCM-induced DIAs in Beijing, China. Setting Drug allergy case reports from the BPD provided by the Beijing Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring. Method Drug allergy cases from January 2004 to December 2014 were adjudicated. DIA triggered by TCMs were analyzed and compared with those triggered by non-TCM drugs by calculating the reported risk ratio (RRR). We also calculated the RRRs based on severe DIA and death outcomes. Main outcome measure TCMs implicated in DIAs were identified and compared with non-TCM drugs. Results TCMs accounted for 1651 (18.2%) of the total 9074 allergic cases, in which 84.4% (1393/1651) were triggered by injections. Of the TCM allergic cases, 8.5% (141) were DIAs and 7.3% (120) were severe DIAs, and three patients died from injections. The RRR between TCMs and non-TCM-induced DIAs was 0.63. When anaphylactic cases were compared between TCMs to the top four non-TCM drug triggers, RRRs were 0.73 (95% CI 0.61-0.87) for antibiotics, 0.36 (95% CI 0.29-0.44) for radiocontrast agents, 0.55 (95% CI 0.43-0.68) for chemotherapeutics, and 0.29 (95% CI 0.23-0.37) for biologics. Compared to TCM oral or topic formulations, TCM injections had higher RRRs in each of the above comparisons. Conclusion TCM was associated with a decreased risk of DIA compared to non-TCM drugs in drug allergy cases, and the risk was higher for TCM injections.

摘要

背景 中药是药物性过敏反应(DIA)的主要诱因之一。目的 我们旨在利用北京药品不良反应监测中心的北京药品不良反应监测数据库(BPD)分析中国北京地区中药引起的药物性过敏反应。设置 由北京药品不良反应监测中心提供的BPD中的药物过敏病例报告。方法 对2004年1月至2014年12月的药物过敏病例进行判定。通过计算报告风险比(RRR)分析中药引发的药物性过敏反应,并与非中药药物引发的反应进行比较。我们还根据严重药物性过敏反应和死亡结果计算了RRR。主要结局指标 确定与药物性过敏反应相关的中药,并与非中药药物进行比较。结果 在9074例过敏病例中,中药占1651例(18.2%),其中84.4%(1393/1651)由注射剂引发。在中药过敏病例中,8.5%(141例)为药物性过敏反应,7.3%(120例)为严重药物性过敏反应,3例患者因注射剂死亡。中药与非中药引发的药物性过敏反应的RRR为0.63。当将中药过敏病例与前四大非中药药物引发的过敏反应进行比较时,抗生素的RRR为0.73(95%CI 0.61-0.87),造影剂为0.36(95%CI 0.29-0.44),化疗药物为0.55(95%CI 0.43-0.68),生物制品为0.29(95%CI 0.23-0.37)。与中药口服或外用制剂相比,中药注射剂在上述每项比较中RRR更高。结论 在药物过敏病例中,与非中药药物相比,中药引发药物性过敏反应的风险较低,且中药注射剂的风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验