• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing Two Cut-off Based Criteria While Investigating the Discriminatory Characteristics of a Tablet-Based Dyscalculia Screening Battery for 5-9 Age Group.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018 May 4;55(2):177-182. doi: 10.5152/npa.2017.19255. eCollection 2018.
2
The frequency of dyscalculia among primary school children.小学生计算障碍的频率。
Psychiatr Danub. 2013 Jun;25(2):170-4.
3
Children With Dyscalculia Show Hippocampal Hyperactivity During Symbolic Number Perception.患有计算障碍的儿童在符号数字感知过程中表现出海马体过度活跃。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jul 20;15:687476. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.687476. eCollection 2021.
4
Preterm birth and dyscalculia.早产与计算障碍。
J Pediatr. 2014 Jun;164(6):1327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.069. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
5
The ratio processing system and its role in fraction understanding: Evidence from a match-to-sample task in children and adults with and without dyscalculia.比率处理系统及其在分数理解中的作用:来自有和没有计算障碍的儿童及成人的样本匹配任务的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Dec;73(12):2158-2176. doi: 10.1177/1747021820940631. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
The effectiveness of training acceptance / commitment and training emotion regulation on high-risk behaviors of students with dyscalculia.接受与承诺训练及情绪调节训练对计算障碍学生高危行为的有效性
Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2013 Sep;2(2):51-8. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.10791. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
7
[Validation of the Short Cognitive Battery (B2C). Value in screening for Alzheimer's disease and depressive disorders in psychiatric practice].[简短认知功能测试组合(B2C)的验证。在精神科实践中筛查阿尔茨海默病和抑郁症的价值]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):266-72.
8
Assessment and conceptual remediation of basic calculation skills in elementary school students.小学生基本计算技能的评估与概念矫正
Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Mar;36(1):78-97. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12214. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
9
A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies of Mathematics Difficulty.系统回顾数学难度的纵向研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Nov/Dec;51(6):523-539. doi: 10.1177/0022219417714773. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
10
[Differential diagnosis of primary and secondary mathematical learning disability – indications from the dyscalculia test Basis-Math 4–8].[原发性与继发性数学学习障碍的鉴别诊断——来自基础数学4-8计算障碍测试的指征]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2016 Sep;44(5):338-350. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000446. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number-space mappings: what underlies mathematics achievement?近似数量感、符号数量处理还是数量-空间映射:是什么支撑着数学成就?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Mar;114(3):418-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
2
Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia).近似数量系统的感知能力受损是数学学习障碍(计算障碍)的基础。
Child Dev. 2011 Jul-Aug;82(4):1224-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01608.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
3
An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development.整数与分数发展的综合理论。
Cogn Psychol. 2011 Jun;62(4):273-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
4
Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia.计算障碍儿童与非计算障碍儿童的符号和非符号数量比较。
Cognition. 2010 Apr;115(1):10-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.006. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
5
First-Grade Predictors of Mathematical Learning Disability: A Latent Class Trajectory Analysis.数学学习障碍的一级预测因素:潜在类别轨迹分析
Cogn Dev. 2009 Jan 1;24(4). doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.001.
6
Neuroscience of learning arithmetic--evidence from brain imaging studies.学习算术的神经科学——来自脑成像研究的证据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Jun;33(6):909-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
7
Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD.数学学习障碍(MLD)儿童的认知特征会因用于定义MLD的截断标准不同而有所差异。
J Learn Disabil. 2007 Sep-Oct;40(5):458-78. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400050901.
8
Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: a comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing.数学学习障碍儿童的基本数字技能:符号与非符号数字大小处理的比较
Cognition. 2007 Mar;102(3):361-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
9
Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation.纯数字估计中的发展差异与个体差异。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):189-201. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.189.
10
Math learning disorder: incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976-82, Rochester, Minn.数学学习障碍:1976 - 1982年明尼苏达州罗切斯特市基于人群的出生队列中的发病率
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):281-9. doi: 10.1367/A04-209R.1.

Comparing Two Cut-off Based Criteria While Investigating the Discriminatory Characteristics of a Tablet-Based Dyscalculia Screening Battery for 5-9 Age Group.

作者信息

Cangöz Banu, Olkun Sinan, Altun Arif, Salman Funda

机构信息

Hacettepe University, Department of Psychology, Ankara, Turkey.

TED University, Department of Elementary Education, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018 May 4;55(2):177-182. doi: 10.5152/npa.2017.19255. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.5152/npa.2017.19255
PMID:30057461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6060656/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Math skills are essential in academic, occupational, and scientific areas as well as in daily life activities. There are two existing models in screening dyscalculia: IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model (DM), and Response to Instruction (RTI) model. In these models, two different cut-off based criteria (being 1 or 2 standard deviation below within their age groups, and being in the lower 5-10% group) are mainly used. The main purpose of this study is to compare these two different cut-off criteria, based on three sub-tests of Tablet-PC Based Dyscalculia Screening Battery (TAB-DSB) (Canonic Dot Counting-CDC, Symbolic Number Comparison-SNC and Mental Number Line-MNL). It is expected to show which criteria would yield the best discrimination in differentiating students who have dyscalculia tendency from the rest of the students in three sub-tests.

METHODS

The participants of the study included 316 volunteer 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year elementary school students.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The results indicated that CDC, SNC, and MNL (MNL1, MNL2) tasks failed to discriminate the groups when the standard deviation rule (below, above, and within 1 standard deviation) was taken into consideration. On the other hand, these tasks were found to be effective in discriminating the groups when the lower 10% and the upper groups were compared.

摘要