Suppr超能文献

远程缺血预处理对冠心病患者冠状动脉灌注压和冠状动脉侧支血流的急性血流动力学影响

Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Coronary Perfusion Pressure and Coronary Collateral Blood Flow in Coronary Heart Disease.

作者信息

Xu Yuansheng, Yu Qinkai, Yang Jianmin, Yuan Fang, Zhong Yigang, Zhou Zhanlin, Wang Ningfu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hangzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310006, China.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018 Jul;34(4):299-306. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201807_34(4).20180317A.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the acute hemodynamic effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on coronary perfusion pressure and coronary collateral blood flow.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients with coronary heart disease with severe (70%-85%) stenosis in one or two vessels confirmed by angiography were enrolled into this study. They were randomly divided into the RIPC group (9 patients) and the control group (8 patients). Distal pressure of coronary artery stenosis before balloon dilation (non-occlusive pressure, P) and distal coronary artery occlusive pressure (P) during balloon dilation occlusion were measured in all patients. The patients in the RIPC group received three cycles of lower limb ischemia-reperfusion preconditioning (5 minutes inflation of a blood pressure cuff, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion). For controls, the cuff was not inflated. After this process, P and P were measured again in each patient.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in angiographic characteristics between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Troponin I (TNI) levels after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were lower in the RIPC group than in the control group (p = 0.004). In the RIPC group, mean P and P were significantly increased after RIPC compared to before RIPC [(72.78 ± 10.10) mmHg vs. (79.67 ± 9.79) mmHg, p = 0.002, (20.89 ± 8.61) mmHg vs. (26.78 ± 10.73) mmHg, p = 0.001, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

RIPC can improve distal coronary perfusion pressure and rapidly increase distal coronary occlusive pressure thereby improving coronary collateral blood flow.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估远程缺血预处理(RIPC)对冠状动脉灌注压和冠状动脉侧支血流的急性血流动力学影响。

方法

共纳入17例经血管造影证实单支或双支血管严重(70%-85%)狭窄的冠心病患者。他们被随机分为RIPC组(9例患者)和对照组(8例患者)。测量所有患者球囊扩张前冠状动脉狭窄远端压力(非闭塞压力,P)和球囊扩张闭塞期间冠状动脉远端闭塞压力(P)。RIPC组患者接受三个周期的下肢缺血-再灌注预处理(血压袖带充气5分钟,随后再灌注5分钟)。对于对照组,袖带不充气。此过程后,再次测量每位患者的P和P。

结果

两组血管造影特征无显著差异(所有p>0.05)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,RIPC组肌钙蛋白I(TNI)水平低于对照组(p=0.004)。在RIPC组中,与RIPC前相比,RIPC后平均P和P显著升高[分别为(72.78±10.10)mmHg对(79.67±9.79)mmHg,p=0.002,(20.89±8.61)mmHg对(26.78±10.73)mmHg,p=0.001]。

结论

RIPC可改善冠状动脉远端灌注压并迅速增加冠状动脉远端闭塞压力,从而改善冠状动脉侧支血流。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
The impact of the apelinergic system in coronary collateral formation.阿片肽系统在冠状动脉侧支形成中的作用
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2023 Apr 7;31(2):192-198. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2023.24422. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

2
Ischaemic conditioning: are we there yet?缺血预处理:我们成功了吗?
Heart. 2015 Jul;101(13):1067-77. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306531. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Periprocedural myocardial infarction: prevalence, prognosis, and prevention.围手术期心肌梗死:患病率、预后及预防
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(6):602-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.959080.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验