Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者的非门控三联闪光冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术

Non-Gated Triple Flash Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

作者信息

M Abazid Rami, A Smettei Osama, F Eldesoky Akram, Al Saqqah Hanaa, S Alenzi Habiba, A Altorbak Nora, S Altorbak Sarah, Ali Dar Mehboob

机构信息

Prince Sultan Cardiac Center Qassim (PSCCQ), King Fahad Specialist Hospital.

Qassim College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018 Jul;34(4):352-358. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201807_34(4).20180222A.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) presents a potential challenge when performing coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). To date, there is no ideal protocol for CTA in patients with AF. We sought to design a protocol for single-heartbeat coronary CTA in patients with AF.

METHODS

We enrolled 32 patients with AF and a very low probability of coronary artery disease who were referred for CTA to assess pulmonary vein anatomy for catheter ablation. A 256-slice scanner was used. Twelve patients underwent CTA using non-gated triple Flash (NGTF) consisting of three prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered helical scans with a built-in ECG simulator, while retrospectively gated helical (RGH) was used in 20 patients. Radiation dose, and a 4-point scale was used to assess coronary artery image quality between CTA scan modes.

RESULTS

A total of 96 vessels were analyzed. The 4-point score showed no significant differences between the RGH and NGTF scans (2.9 ± 0.6 vs. 2.8 ± 0.8, respectively; p = 0.34). The number of coronary arteries with extensive blurring did not significantly differ between the protocols, and included four vessels (6.6%) in RGH vs. three vessels (8.3%) in NGTF (p = 0.5). Radiation exposure was significantly higher with RGH scans, with a dose-length product of 835 ± 146 mGy compared with 382 ± 35 mGy for NGTF (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Single heartbeat NGTF CTA has comparable image quality and significantly lower radiation dose compared to RGH scans in patients with AF. Whether this protocol can be used in next-generation computed tomography scanners has yet to be determined.

摘要

背景

在进行冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)时,心房颤动(AF)带来了潜在挑战。迄今为止,尚无针对AF患者的CTA理想方案。我们试图设计一种用于AF患者单心跳冠状动脉CTA的方案。

方法

我们纳入了32例冠状动脉疾病可能性极低且因AF被转诊进行CTA以评估肺静脉解剖结构以进行导管消融的患者。使用了一台256层扫描仪。12例患者采用非门控三闪(NGTF)进行CTA,包括三次前瞻性心电图(ECG)触发的螺旋扫描及内置ECG模拟器,而20例患者采用回顾性门控螺旋扫描(RGH)。采用辐射剂量,并使用4分制评估CTA扫描模式之间的冠状动脉图像质量。

结果

共分析了96支血管。4分制评分显示RGH和NGTF扫描之间无显著差异(分别为2.9±0.6和2.8±0.8;p=0.34)。方案之间冠状动脉广泛模糊的数量无显著差异,RGH中有4支血管(6.6%),NGTF中有3支血管(8.3%)(p=0.5)。RGH扫描的辐射暴露显著更高,剂量长度乘积为835±146 mGy,而NGTF为382±35 mGy(p<0.0001)。

结论

与AF患者的RGH扫描相比,单心跳NGTF CTA具有相当的图像质量且辐射剂量显著更低。该方案是否可用于下一代计算机断层扫描仪尚未确定。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Cardiac computed tomography in current cardiology guidelines.当前心脏病学指南中的心脏计算机断层扫描。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(6):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
6
Current and Novel Imaging Techniques in Coronary CT.冠状动脉CT中的当前及新型成像技术
Radiographics. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):991-1010. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140181. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验