• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Authors' response to comment on "International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study".

作者信息

Lovegrove Josephine, Fulbrook Paul, Miles Sandra

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Nursing Research and Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):738-741. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13519. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.13519
PMID:33200527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8450788/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Authors' response to comment on "International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study".作者对关于“针对重症患者按风险水平进行压力性损伤预防干预的国际共识：一项改良德尔菲研究”的评论的回应
Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):738-741. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13519. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
Comment on "International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study".对《重症患者压力性损伤预防干预措施风险水平的国际共识：一项改良德尔菲研究》的评论
Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):742-743. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13520. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Core outcome measures for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness: an international modified Delphi consensus study evaluation (CONCISE).重症患者营养代谢干预的临床疗效试验的核心结局指标：国际改良德尔菲共识研究评估（CONCISE）。
Crit Care. 2022 Aug 6;26(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04113-x.
4
Bleeding Assessment Scale in Critically Ill Children (BASIC): Physician-Driven Diagnostic Criteria for Bleeding Severity.危重症患儿出血评估量表（BASIC）：基于医师判断的出血严重程度诊断标准。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1766-1772. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004025.
5
Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine.危重症成年患者皮质类固醇功能不全的诊断与管理建议：美国危重病医学会国际特别工作组的共识声明
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1937-49. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817603ba.
6
[Experts consensus on the management of the right heart function in critically ill patients].[危重症患者右心功能管理的专家共识]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 1;56(12):962-973. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.12.017.
7
Consensus Obtained for the Nephrotoxic Potential of 167 Drugs in Adult Critically Ill Patients Using a Modified Delphi Method.采用改良 Delphi 法对成年危重症患者的 167 种药物的肾毒性潜力达成共识。
Drug Saf. 2022 Apr;45(4):389-398. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01173-4. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
8
Methodology: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.方法学：大流行和灾害期间危重症和伤员的医疗照护：CHEST 共识声明。
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):35S-41S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0746.
9
Core Outcome Measures for Research in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory or Cardiac Failure: An International, Multidisciplinary, Modified Delphi Consensus Study.体外膜肺氧合治疗急性呼吸或心脏衰竭危重症患者的核心结局指标研究：一项国际性、多学科、改良 Delphi 共识研究。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1557-1563. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003954.
10
Core outcomes for pressure ulcer prevention trials: results of an international consensus study: Classification: Outcomes and qualitative research.压疮预防试验的核心结局：一项国际共识研究的结果：分类：结局与定性研究
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;187(5):743-752. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21741. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.国际危重症患者压力性损伤预防干预措施风险级别共识：一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1112-1127. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13461. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
2
Relationship Between Prescription and Documentation of Pressure Injury Prevention Interventions and Their Implementation: An Exploratory, Descriptive Study.预防压力性损伤干预措施的处方与记录及其实施之间的关系：一项探索性、描述性研究。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Dec;17(6):465-475. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12473. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
3
Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in hospitalised adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全球住院成年患者压力性损伤的患病率和发病率：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 May;105:103546. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103546. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
4
The effectiveness of multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs in adult intensive care patients: A systematic review.多组分压力性损伤预防方案在成人重症监护患者中的效果：系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103483. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103483. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
The relationship between pressure injury complication and mortality risk of older patients in follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis.压力性损伤并发症与老年患者随访期间死亡风险的关系：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1533-1544. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13243. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
6
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压疮的风险评估工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD006471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4.
7
The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States.美国医院获得性压力性损伤的国家成本。
Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):634-640. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13071. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
The relationship between pressure ulcer risk assessment and preventative interventions: a systematic review.压力性溃疡风险评估与预防干预措施之间的关系：一项系统综述
J Wound Care. 2018 Dec 2;27(12):862-875. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.12.862.
9
Prevalence of pressure injury in adults presenting to the emergency department by ambulance.救护车送诊的成人急诊患者压疮发生率。
Aust Crit Care. 2019 Nov;32(6):509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
Incidence and Prevalence of Pressure Injuries in Adult Intensive Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人重症监护病房患者压力性损伤的发生率和患病率：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):e1074-e1081. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003366.