Suppr超能文献

国际危重症患者压力性损伤预防干预措施风险级别共识:一项改良 Delphi 研究。

International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, Queensland, Australia.

Nursing Research and Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1112-1127. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13461. Epub 2020 Aug 16.

Abstract

The aim of this modified Delphi study was to determine a minimum pressure injury preventative intervention set for implementation relative to critically ill patients' risk level. Preventative interventions were identified via systematic review, risk levels categorised by an intensive-care-specific risk-assessment-scale (COMHON Index), and panel members (n = 67) identified through an international critical care nursing body. Round 1: panel members were asked to rate implementation of 12 interventions according to risk level (low, moderate, high). Round 2: interventions were rated for use at the risk level which received greatest round 1 support. Round 3: interventions not yet achieving consensus were again rated, and discarded where consensus was not reached. Consensus indicated all patients should receive: risk assessment within 2-hours of admission; 8-hourly risk reassessment; and use of disposable incontinence pads. Additionally, moderate- and high-risk patients should receive: a reactive mattress support surface and a heel off-loading device. High-risk patients should also receive: nutritional supplements if eating orally; preventative dressings (sacral, heel, trochanteric); an active mattress support surface; and a pressure-redistributing cushion for sitting. Repositioning is required at least 4-hourly for low-risk, and 2-hourly for moderate- and high-risk patients. Rigorous application of the intervention set has the potential to decrease pressure injuries in intensive care.

摘要

本改良 Delphi 研究的目的是确定与危重症患者风险水平相关的最小压力性损伤预防干预集。通过系统评价确定预防干预措施,通过特定于重症监护的风险评估量表(COMHON 指数)对风险水平进行分类,并通过国际重症监护护理机构确定专家组(n=67)。第 1 轮:要求专家组根据风险水平(低、中、高)对 12 项干预措施的实施情况进行评分。第 2 轮:对在第 1 轮获得最大支持的风险水平使用的干预措施进行评分。第 3 轮:对尚未达成共识的干预措施再次进行评分,如果仍未达成共识则予以淘汰。共识表明所有患者均应接受:入院后 2 小时内进行风险评估;每 8 小时重新评估风险;使用一次性失禁垫。此外,中危和高危患者应接受:反应性床垫支撑面和足跟减压装置。高危患者还应接受:如果经口进食则给予营养补充剂;预防性敷料(骶骨、足跟、转子间);主动床垫支撑面;以及用于坐姿的压力重新分布垫。低危患者至少每 4 小时翻身一次,中危和高危患者每 2 小时翻身一次。严格执行干预集有可能降低重症监护中的压力性损伤。

相似文献

2
Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(2):1-104. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
6
Nursing interventions for pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients: A systematic review.
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Aug;30(15-16):2151-2168. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15709. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD009958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009958.pub2.
9
Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD009958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009958.pub3.
10
Guideline implementation results in a decrease of pressure ulcer incidence in critically ill patients.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):815-20. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000257072.10313.56.

引用本文的文献

3
Reduction in the Incidence Density of Pressure Injuries in Intensive Care Units after Advance Preventive Protocols.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;11(15):2116. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152116.
4
Risk factors for new-onset atrial fibrillation during critical illness: A Delphi study.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Nov;23(4):414-424. doi: 10.1177/17511437211022132. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Translation and piloting of the Chinese Mandarin version of an intensive care-specific pressure injury risk assessment tool (the COMHON Index).
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Mar 18;9(2):169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.003. eCollection 2022 Apr.

本文引用的文献

2
Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD009958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009958.pub3.
3
Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in hospitalised adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 May;105:103546. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103546. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
4
Device-related pressure ulcers: SECURE prevention.
J Wound Care. 2020 Feb 1;29(Sup2a):S1-S52. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup2a.S1.
5
The effectiveness of multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs in adult intensive care patients: A systematic review.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103483. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103483. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States.
Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):634-640. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13071. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Oct;81(4):881-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.069. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
10
The Effect of Support Surfaces on the Incidence of Pressure Injuries in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Crit Care Res Pract. 2018 Dec 18;2018:3712067. doi: 10.1155/2018/3712067. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验