• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利奈唑胺对艰难梭菌具有靶向抗菌作用,与万古霉素相比,可增强对人类肠道微生物群的保护。

Enhanced preservation of the human intestinal microbiota by ridinilazole, a novel Clostridium difficile-targeting antibacterial, compared to vancomycin.

机构信息

Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 2;13(8):e0199810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199810. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0199810
PMID:30071046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6071993/
Abstract

Ridinilazole, a novel targeted antibacterial being developed for the treatment of C. difficile infection (CDI) and prevention of recurrence, was shown in a recent Phase 2 study to be superior to vancomycin with regard to the primary efficacy measure, sustained clinical response (SCR), with the superiority being driven primarily by marked reductions in the rates of CDI recurrence within 30 days. Tolerability of ridinilazole was comparable to that of vancomycin. The current nested cohort study compared the effects of ridinilazole and vancomycin on fecal microbiota during and after treatment among participants in the Phase 2 study. Changes in the microbiota were assessed using qPCR and high-throughput sequencing on participants' stools collected at multiple time-points (baseline [Day 1], Day 5, end-of-treatment [EOT; Day 10], Day 25, end-of-study [EOS; Day 40], and at CDI recurrence). qPCR analyses showed profound losses of Bacteroides, C. coccoides, C. leptum, and Prevotella groups at EOT with vancomycin treatment, while ridinilazole-treated participants had a modest decrease in C. leptum group levels at EOT, with levels recovering by Day 25. Vancomycin-treated participants had a significant increase in the Enterobacteriaceae group, with this increase persisting beyond EOT. At EOT, alpha diversity decreased with both antibiotics, though to a significantly lesser extent with ridinilazole (p <0.0001). Beta diversity analysis showed a significantly larger weighted Unifrac distance from baseline-to-EOT with vancomycin. Taxonomically, ridinilazole had a markedly narrower impact, with modest reductions in relative abundance in Firmicutes taxa. Microbiota composition returned to baseline sooner with ridinilazole than with vancomycin. Vancomycin treatment resulted in microbiome-wide changes, with significant reductions in relative abundances of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and a profound increase in abundance of Proteobacteria. These findings demonstrate that ridinilazole is significantly less disruptive to microbiota than vancomycin, which may contribute to the reduced CDI recurrence observed in the Phase 2 study.

摘要

利奈唑胺是一种新型靶向抗菌药物,用于治疗艰难梭菌感染(CDI)和预防复发。最近的一项 2 期研究表明,与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺在主要疗效指标,持续临床应答(SCR)方面具有优势,其优势主要归因于 30 天内 CDI 复发率的显著降低。利奈唑胺的耐受性与万古霉素相当。目前这项嵌套队列研究比较了 2 期研究参与者在治疗期间和治疗结束后利奈唑胺和万古霉素对粪便微生物群的影响。使用 qPCR 和高通量测序技术,在参与者的粪便中评估了微生物群的变化,这些粪便样本是在多个时间点采集的(基线[第 1 天]、第 5 天、治疗结束[第 10 天]、第 25 天、研究结束[第 40 天]和 CDI 复发时)。qPCR 分析显示,万古霉素治疗后 EOT 时,拟杆菌属、梭菌 coccoides 群、梭菌 leptum 群和普雷沃氏菌属显著减少,而利奈唑胺治疗组 EOT 时梭菌 leptum 群水平略有下降,第 25 天恢复。万古霉素治疗组肠杆菌科显著增加,这种增加持续到 EOT 后。EOT 时,两种抗生素均导致 alpha 多样性降低,但利奈唑胺降低的程度明显较小(p <0.0001)。β多样性分析显示,万古霉素的基线到 EOT 加权 Unifrac 距离明显更大。从分类学上看,利奈唑胺的影响明显较小,厚壁菌门的相对丰度略有降低。利奈唑胺使微生物群组成更快地恢复到基线,而万古霉素则不然。万古霉素治疗导致微生物组广泛变化,Firmicutes、Bacteroidetes、Actinobacteria 的相对丰度显著降低,而 Proteobacteria 的丰度显著增加。这些发现表明,与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺对微生物群的干扰显著较小,这可能是 2 期研究中观察到 CDI 复发减少的原因之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/762137f1ed5a/pone.0199810.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/c6e7f4359e32/pone.0199810.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/25fda2e09afa/pone.0199810.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/3bdcc9b65ba2/pone.0199810.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/762137f1ed5a/pone.0199810.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/c6e7f4359e32/pone.0199810.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/25fda2e09afa/pone.0199810.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/3bdcc9b65ba2/pone.0199810.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772d/6071993/762137f1ed5a/pone.0199810.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhanced preservation of the human intestinal microbiota by ridinilazole, a novel Clostridium difficile-targeting antibacterial, compared to vancomycin.利奈唑胺对艰难梭菌具有靶向抗菌作用,与万古霉素相比,可增强对人类肠道微生物群的保护。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 2;13(8):e0199810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199810. eCollection 2018.
2
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Ridinilazole Versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Clinical Outcomes With Microbiome and Metabolome Correlates of Response.利迪尼唑与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的随机、双盲、3期安全性和有效性研究:微生物组和代谢组与反应相关性的临床结果
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 14;78(6):1462-1472. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad792.
3
Ridinilazole: a novel therapy for Clostridium difficile infection.利福昔明:一种治疗艰难梭菌感染的新型疗法。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
Ridinilazole for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.利福昔明治疗艰难梭菌感染。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2019 Apr;28(4):303-310. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1582640. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
5
Ridinilazole: a novel, narrow-spectrum antimicrobial agent targeting Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile.利奈唑胺:一种新型、窄谱抗菌药物,针对艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌属)。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2022 Sep;75(3):526-536. doi: 10.1111/lam.13664. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
6
Antimicrobial susceptibility and ribotypes of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of ridinilazole (SMT19969) and vancomycin.利奈唑胺(SMT19969)和万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的 2 期临床试验中艰难梭菌分离株的药敏性和核糖体分型。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Aug 1;73(8):2078-2084. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky135.
7
Efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study.利地硝唑与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的疗效和安全性比较:一项2期随机双盲活性对照非劣效性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):735-744. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30235-9. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
8
Fidaxomicin preserves the intestinal microbiome during and after treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and reduces both toxin reexpression and recurrence of CDI. fidaxomicin 在治疗艰难梭菌感染 (CDI) 期间和之后保留肠道微生物组,并减少毒素再表达和 CDI 的复发。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S132-42. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis338.
9
Ridinilazole, a narrow spectrum antibiotic for treatment of infection, enhances preservation of microbiota-dependent bile acids.利奈唑胺是一种窄谱抗生素,用于治疗感染,可增强依赖于微生物群的胆汁酸的保留。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020 Aug 1;319(2):G227-G237. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00046.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
The presence of Clostridioides difficile in faeces before and after faecal microbiota transplantation and its relation with recurrent C. difficile infection and the gut microbiota in a Dutch cohort.荷兰队列中粪便微生物群移植前后粪便中艰难梭菌的存在及其与复发性艰难梭菌感染和肠道微生物群的关系。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Apr;31(4):568-574. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond antibiotics: exploring multifaceted approaches to combat bacterial resistance in the modern era: a comprehensive review.超越抗生素:探索现代对抗细菌耐药性的多方面方法:全面综述
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Mar 18;15:1493915. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1493915. eCollection 2025.
2
A Review of Therapies for Infection.感染治疗综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;14(1):17. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010017.
3
Microbiome and Metabolome Restoration After Administration of Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm (REBYOTA®) for Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

本文引用的文献

1
Protective Factors in the Intestinal Microbiome Against Clostridium difficile Infection in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.异基因造血干细胞移植受者肠道微生物群中抵抗艰难梭菌感染的保护因素
J Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 1;215(7):1117-1123. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix011.
2
Efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study.利地硝唑与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的疗效和安全性比较:一项2期随机双盲活性对照非劣效性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):735-744. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30235-9. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
3
给予粪便微生物群制剂Live-jslm(REBYOTA®)预防艰难梭菌反复感染后微生物组和代谢组的恢复
J Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 22. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae418.
4
Comparison of fidaxomicin, metronidazole and vancomycin for initial episode and recurrence of infection - An observational cohort study.非达霉素、甲硝唑和万古霉素用于感染初发及复发的比较——一项观察性队列研究
Heliyon. 2024 May 7;10(10):e30742. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30742. eCollection 2024 May 30.
5
Impact of a Whole-Food, High-Soluble Fiber Diet on the Gut-Muscle Axis in Aged Mice.全食物、高可溶性纤维饮食对老年小鼠肠道-肌肉轴的影响。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 28;16(9):1323. doi: 10.3390/nu16091323.
6
infection: history, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, clinical manifestations, treatment, and future options.感染:历史、流行病学、风险因素、预防、临床表现、治疗和未来选择。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0013523. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00135-23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Ridinilazole Versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Clinical Outcomes With Microbiome and Metabolome Correlates of Response.利迪尼唑与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的随机、双盲、3期安全性和有效性研究:微生物组和代谢组与反应相关性的临床结果
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 14;78(6):1462-1472. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad792.
8
Animal and In Vitro Models as Powerful Tools to Decipher the Effects of Enteric Pathogens on the Human Gut Microbiota.动物和体外模型作为解读肠道病原体对人类肠道微生物群影响的有力工具。
Microorganisms. 2023 Dec 29;12(1):67. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010067.
9
A US-based national surveillance study for the susceptibility and epidemiology of isolates with special reference to ridinilazole: 2020-2021.一项基于美国的全国性监测研究,旨在调查具有特殊参考意义的利奈唑胺敏感性和流行病学的 分离株:2020-2021 年。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Oct 18;67(10):e0034923. doi: 10.1128/aac.00349-23. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
10
Gut microbiota changes associated with infection and its various treatment strategies.与 感染及其各种治疗策略相关的肠道微生物组变化。
Gut Microbes. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2223345. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2223345.
Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults.
在一项为期6周的随机试验中,用全谷物替代精制谷物对健康成年人的肠道微生物群以及免疫和炎症标志物有适度影响。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Mar;105(3):635-650. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.146928. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
4
Short- and long-term effects of oral vancomycin on the human intestinal microbiota.口服万古霉素对人体肠道微生物群的短期和长期影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72(1):128-136. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw383. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
5
Ridinilazole: a novel therapy for Clostridium difficile infection.利福昔明:一种治疗艰难梭菌感染的新型疗法。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 May 30.
6
Dynamics of the fecal microbiome in patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent Clostridium difficile infection.复发性和非复发性艰难梭菌感染患者粪便微生物群的动态变化
Genome Med. 2016 Apr 27;8(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0298-8.
7
Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection associates with distinct bile acid and microbiome profiles.复发性艰难梭菌感染与独特的胆汁酸和微生物群谱相关。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jun;43(11):1142-53. doi: 10.1111/apt.13616. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Antimicrobial Use, Human Gut Microbiota and Clostridium difficile Colonization and Infection.抗菌药物的使用、人类肠道微生物群与艰难梭菌定植和感染。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2015 Jul 3;4(3):230-53. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics4030230.
9
Clinical and Healthcare Burden of Multiple Recurrences of Clostridium difficile Infection.艰难梭菌感染多次复发的临床和医疗负担。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;62(5):574-580. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ958. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Identification of key taxa that favor intestinal colonization of Clostridium difficile in an adult Chinese population.在中国成年人群中鉴定有利于艰难梭菌肠道定植的关键分类群。
Microbes Infect. 2016 Jan;18(1):30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 14.