• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半参数加法风险模型中的工具变量估计

Instrumental variable estimation in semi-parametric additive hazards models.

作者信息

Brueckner Matthias, Titman Andrew, Jaki Thomas

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, U.K.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2019 Mar;75(1):110-120. doi: 10.1111/biom.12952. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/biom.12952
PMID:30073669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7379316/
Abstract

Instrumental variable methods allow unbiased estimation in the presence of unmeasured confounders when an appropriate instrumental variable is available. Two-stage least-squares and residual inclusion methods have recently been adapted to additive hazard models for censored survival data. The semi-parametric additive hazard model which can include time-independent and time-dependent covariate effects is particularly suited for the two-stage residual inclusion method, since it allows direct estimation of time-independent covariate effects without restricting the effect of the residual on the hazard. In this article, we prove asymptotic normality of two-stage residual inclusion estimators of regression coefficients in a semi-parametric additive hazard model with time-independent and time-dependent covariate effects. We consider the cases of continuous and binary exposure. Estimation of the conditional survival function given observed covariates is discussed and a resampling scheme is proposed to obtain simultaneous confidence bands. The new methods are compared to existing ones in a simulation study and are applied to a real data set. The proposed methods perform favorably especially in cases with exposure-dependent censoring.

摘要

当存在合适的工具变量时,工具变量法能够在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下进行无偏估计。两阶段最小二乘法和残差纳入法最近已被应用于删失生存数据的加法风险模型。半参数加法风险模型可以包括与时间无关和与时间有关的协变量效应,特别适合于两阶段残差纳入法,因为它允许直接估计与时间无关的协变量效应,而无需限制残差对风险的影响。在本文中,我们证明了在具有与时间无关和与时间有关的协变量效应的半参数加法风险模型中,两阶段残差纳入估计量的回归系数的渐近正态性。我们考虑连续暴露和二元暴露的情况。讨论了给定观察到的协变量时条件生存函数的估计,并提出了一种重采样方案以获得同时置信带。在模拟研究中将新方法与现有方法进行了比较,并将其应用于一个真实数据集。所提出的方法表现良好,尤其是在存在与暴露有关的删失的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1e/7379316/993fb549703a/BIOM-75-110-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1e/7379316/a3a045f30690/BIOM-75-110-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1e/7379316/993fb549703a/BIOM-75-110-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1e/7379316/a3a045f30690/BIOM-75-110-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1e/7379316/993fb549703a/BIOM-75-110-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Instrumental variable estimation in semi-parametric additive hazards models.半参数加法风险模型中的工具变量估计
Biometrics. 2019 Mar;75(1):110-120. doi: 10.1111/biom.12952. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.基于工具变量的时变风险比估计,无需在一个遗漏协变量上进行条件推断。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01245-6.
3
Reader reaction: Instrumental variable additive hazards models with exposure-dependent censoring.读者反馈:具有暴露依赖删失的工具变量相加风险模型
Biometrics. 2016 Sep;72(3):1003-5. doi: 10.1111/biom.12471. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.工具变量估计因果风险比。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):539-550. doi: 10.1111/biom.13792. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
Instrumental variable additive hazards models.工具变量相加风险模型
Biometrics. 2015 Mar;71(1):122-130. doi: 10.1111/biom.12244. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
6
Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.使用大型观测数据集评估因果治疗效果估计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0858-x.
7
Multiplicative versus additive modelling of causal effects using instrumental variables for survival outcomes - a comparison.使用工具变量对生存结局进行因果效应的乘法建模与加法建模——一项比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/09622802241293765. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
8
Additive hazard causal model with a binary instrumental variable.具有二元工具变量的相加风险因果模型。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Mar 20:9622802251314288. doi: 10.1177/09622802251314288.
9
Bias in estimating the causal hazard ratio when using two-stage instrumental variable methods.使用两阶段工具变量法时因果风险比估计中的偏差。
Stat Med. 2015 Jun 30;34(14):2235-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.6470. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.未测量的组内和组间混杂因素对连续暴露效应估计值偏倚的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Aug;29(8):2119-2139. doi: 10.1177/0962280219883323. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiplicative versus additive modelling of causal effects using instrumental variables for survival outcomes - a comparison.使用工具变量对生存结局进行因果效应的乘法建模与加法建模——一项比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/09622802241293765. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Addressing the issue of bias in observational studies: Using instrumental variables and a quasi-randomization trial in an ESME research project.解决观察性研究中的偏倚问题:在 ESME 研究项目中使用工具变量和准随机化试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0255017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255017. eCollection 2021.
3
Instrumental variable estimation of truncated local average treatment effects.

本文引用的文献

1
On two-stage estimation of structural instrumental variable models.关于结构工具变量模型的两阶段估计
Biometrika. 2017 Dec;104(4):881-899. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asx056. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
2
Instrumental variables estimation of exposure effects on a time-to-event endpoint using structural cumulative survival models.使用结构累积生存模型对事件发生时间终点的暴露效应进行工具变量估计。
Biometrics. 2017 Dec;73(4):1140-1149. doi: 10.1111/biom.12699. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Nonparametric binary instrumental variable analysis of competing risks data.
工具变量估计截断局部平均处理效应。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249642. eCollection 2021.
竞争风险数据的非参数二元工具变量分析
Biostatistics. 2017 Jan;18(1):48-61. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw023. Epub 2016 Jun 26.
4
Reader reaction: Instrumental variable additive hazards models with exposure-dependent censoring.读者反馈:具有暴露依赖删失的工具变量相加风险模型
Biometrics. 2016 Sep;72(3):1003-5. doi: 10.1111/biom.12471. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
Instrumental variable estimation in a survival context.生存背景下的工具变量估计
Epidemiology. 2015 May;26(3):402-10. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000262.
6
A Bayesian approach for instrumental variable analysis with censored time-to-event outcome.一种用于具有删失事件发生时间结局的工具变量分析的贝叶斯方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 20;34(4):664-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.6369. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
7
Instrumental variable additive hazards models.工具变量相加风险模型
Biometrics. 2015 Mar;71(1):122-130. doi: 10.1111/biom.12244. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
8
Estimating treatment effects with treatment switching via semicompeting risks models: an application to a colorectal cancer study.通过半竞争风险模型估计治疗转换的治疗效果:在一项结直肠癌研究中的应用。
Biometrika. 2012 Mar;99(1):167-184. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asr062. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
9
Inference for the effect of treatment on survival probability in randomized trials with noncompliance and administrative censoring.在存在不依从和行政审查的随机试验中,对治疗对生存概率影响的推断。
Biometrics. 2011 Dec;67(4):1397-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01575.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
10
Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.野生型KRAS是帕尼单抗对转移性结直肠癌患者疗效所必需的。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. Epub 2008 Mar 3.