• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation procedures for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.阶梯楔形整群随机试验的盲法和非盲法样本量重新估计程序。
Biom J. 2018 Sep;60(5):903-916. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700125. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
2
Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation in crossover trials balanced for period.在针对时期进行平衡的交叉试验中进行盲法和非盲法样本量重新估计。
Biom J. 2018 Sep;60(5):917-933. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700092. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
A systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials in high impact journals: assessing the design, rationale, and analysis.对高影响力期刊中阶梯楔形整群随机试验的系统评价:评估设计、原理和分析
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;178:111622. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111622. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
4
An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.在具有连续结局的横断面、阶梯式整群随机试验中,整群大小的不平衡不会导致显著的效能损失。
Trials. 2017 Mar 7;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1832-8.
5
The current use of feasibility studies in the assessment of feasibility for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.当前在评估阶梯式楔形群组随机试验可行性中使用可行性研究的情况:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0658-3.
6
Blinded and unblinded internal pilot study designs for clinical trials with count data.针对计数数据临床试验的盲法和非盲法内部预试验设计。
Biom J. 2013 Jul;55(4):617-33. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201200189. Epub 2013 May 24.
7
Sample Size Calculation for an Individual Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial.个体分段随机试验的样本量计算。
Biom J. 2024 Jul;66(5):e202300167. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202300167.
8
Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.具有变群大小的横断 stepped wedge 群随机试验的功效计算。
Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):951-962. doi: 10.1111/biom.13164. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Follow up after sample size re-estimation in a breast cancer randomized trial for disease-free survival.乳腺癌无病生存随机试验中样本量重估后的随访。
Trials. 2019 Aug 23;20(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3632-9.
10
Power calculation for detecting interaction effect in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: an important tool for disparity research.横断面阶梯楔形整群随机试验中检测交互作用效应的功效计算:差异研究的重要工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02162-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Power analysis for concurrent balanced or imbalanced multiple-intervention stepped wedge design: a simulation-based approach.并发平衡或不平衡多干预阶梯楔形设计的功效分析:一种基于模拟的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02546-w.
2
Response adaptive intervention allocation in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.阶梯式楔形群组随机试验中的反应自适应干预分配。
Stat Med. 2022 Mar 15;41(6):1081-1099. doi: 10.1002/sim.9317. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
3
Interim data monitoring in cluster randomised trials: Practical issues and a case study.群组随机对照试验中的中期数据监测:实际问题及案例研究。
Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;18(5):552-561. doi: 10.1177/17407745211024751. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.考虑到右截断的计数结局的群组随机试验的样本量和功效。
Biom J. 2021 Jun;63(5):1052-1071. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000230. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Stepped wedge designs: insights from a design of experiments perspective.阶梯楔形设计:从实验设计角度的见解
Stat Med. 2017 Oct 30;36(24):3772-3790. doi: 10.1002/sim.7403. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
2
Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.分组序贯设计在阶梯式楔形群组随机试验中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):507-517. doi: 10.1177/1740774517716937. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features.阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验设计:报告质量与设计特征综述
Trials. 2017 Jan 21;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1783-0.
4
Blinded versus unblinded estimation of a correlation coefficient to inform interim design adaptations.相关系数的盲法估计与非盲法估计以指导期中设计调整。
Biom J. 2017 Mar;59(2):344-357. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500233. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
5
Increased risk of type I errors in cluster randomised trials with small or medium numbers of clusters: a review, reanalysis, and simulation study.小型或中型整群随机试验中I型错误风险增加:一项综述、再分析及模拟研究
Trials. 2016 Sep 6;17(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1571-2.
6
Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials.阶梯楔形及其他纵向整群随机试验的样本量计算
Stat Med. 2016 Nov 20;35(26):4718-4728. doi: 10.1002/sim.7028. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Substantial risks associated with few clusters in cluster randomized and stepped wedge designs.整群随机对照试验和阶梯式楔形设计中,少数群组存在的重大风险。
Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):459-63. doi: 10.1177/1740774516634316. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs.阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验:一个包括平行和多级设计的通用框架。
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 30;34(2):181-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.6325. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
9
The use of the cluster randomized crossover design in clinical trials: protocol for a systematic review.临床试验中整群随机交叉设计的应用:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 12;3:86. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-86.
10
Re-estimating sample size in cluster randomised trials with active recruitment within clusters.在集群内进行积极招募的整群随机试验中重新估计样本量。
Stat Med. 2014 Aug 30;33(19):3253-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.6172. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

阶梯楔形整群随机试验的盲法和非盲法样本量重新估计程序。

Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation procedures for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.

作者信息

Grayling Michael J, Mander Adrian P, Wason James M S

机构信息

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Biom J. 2018 Sep;60(5):903-916. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700125. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.201700125
PMID:30073685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6175439/
Abstract

The ability to accurately estimate the sample size required by a stepped-wedge (SW) cluster randomized trial (CRT) routinely depends upon the specification of several nuisance parameters. If these parameters are misspecified, the trial could be overpowered, leading to increased cost, or underpowered, enhancing the likelihood of a false negative. We address this issue here for cross-sectional SW-CRTs, analyzed with a particular linear-mixed model, by proposing methods for blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation (SSRE). First, blinded estimators for the variance parameters of a SW-CRT analyzed using the Hussey and Hughes model are derived. Following this, procedures for blinded and unblinded SSRE after any time period in a SW-CRT are detailed. The performance of these procedures is then examined and contrasted using two example trial design scenarios. We find that if the two key variance parameters were underspecified by 50%, the SSRE procedures were able to increase power over the conventional SW-CRT design by up to 41%, resulting in an empirical power above the desired level. Thus, though there are practical issues to consider, the performance of the procedures means researchers should consider incorporating SSRE in to future SW-CRTs.

摘要

准确估计阶梯楔形(SW)整群随机试验(CRT)所需样本量的能力通常取决于几个干扰参数的设定。如果这些参数设定错误,试验可能会效能过高,导致成本增加,或者效能不足,增加假阴性的可能性。在此,我们针对横断面SW - CRTs,通过提出盲法和非盲法样本量重新估计(SSRE)方法,使用特定的线性混合模型进行分析,来解决这个问题。首先,推导使用赫西和休斯模型分析的SW - CRT方差参数的盲法估计量。在此之后,详细说明SW - CRT在任何时间段后的盲法和非盲法SSRE程序。然后,使用两个示例试验设计场景来检验和对比这些程序的性能。我们发现,如果两个关键方差参数设定不足50%,SSRE程序能够使效能比传统SW - CRT设计提高多达41%,从而使经验效能高于期望水平。因此,尽管有实际问题需要考虑,但这些程序的性能意味着研究人员应考虑将SSRE纳入未来的SW - CRTs中。