• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有变群大小的横断 stepped wedge 群随机试验的功效计算。

Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):951-962. doi: 10.1111/biom.13164. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13164
PMID:31625596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7165039/
Abstract

Standard sample size calculation formulas for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) assume that cluster sizes are equal. When cluster sizes vary substantially, ignoring this variation may lead to an under-powered study. We investigate the relative efficiency of a SW-CRT with varying cluster sizes to equal cluster sizes, and derive variance estimators for the intervention effect that account for this variation under a mixed effects model-a commonly used approach for analyzing data from cluster randomized trials. When cluster sizes vary, the power of a SW-CRT depends on the order in which clusters receive the intervention, which is determined through randomization. We first derive a variance formula that corresponds to any particular realization of the randomized sequence and propose efficient algorithms to identify upper and lower bounds of the power. We then obtain an "expected" power based on a first-order approximation to the variance formula, where the expectation is taken with respect to all possible randomization sequences. Finally, we provide a variance formula for more general settings where only the cluster size arithmetic mean and coefficient of variation, instead of exact cluster sizes, are known in the design stage. We evaluate our methods through simulations and illustrate that the average power of a SW-CRT decreases as the variation in cluster sizes increases, and the impact is largest when the number of clusters is small.

摘要

标准的阶乘群组随机试验(SW-CRT)样本量计算公式假设群组大小相等。当群组大小存在显著差异时,忽略这种变化可能会导致研究结果无效。我们研究了群组大小变化的 SW-CRT 与群组大小相等的 SW-CRT 的相对效率,并推导出了在混合效应模型下考虑这种变化的干预效果方差估计值,这是一种常用于分析群组随机试验数据的方法。当群组大小变化时,SW-CRT 的功效取决于群组接受干预的顺序,这是通过随机化决定的。我们首先推导出一个与随机序列的任何特定实现相对应的方差公式,并提出了有效的算法来确定功效的上限和下限。然后,我们基于方差公式的一阶近似值获得“预期”功效,其中期望是针对所有可能的随机化序列进行的。最后,我们提供了一个更一般的方差公式,其中在设计阶段仅知道群组大小的算术平均值和变异系数,而不是确切的群组大小。我们通过模拟评估了我们的方法,并说明随着群组大小变化的增加,SW-CRT 的平均功效会降低,当群组数量较小时,这种影响最大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/fa48105cd462/nihms-1055732-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/b6bc8988c717/nihms-1055732-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/de71838f9471/nihms-1055732-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/b97150b3ed33/nihms-1055732-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/6068acdc8808/nihms-1055732-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/fa48105cd462/nihms-1055732-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/b6bc8988c717/nihms-1055732-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/de71838f9471/nihms-1055732-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/b97150b3ed33/nihms-1055732-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/6068acdc8808/nihms-1055732-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f904/7165039/fa48105cd462/nihms-1055732-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.具有变群大小的横断 stepped wedge 群随机试验的功效计算。
Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):951-962. doi: 10.1111/biom.13164. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
2
An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.在具有连续结局的横断面、阶梯式整群随机试验中,整群大小的不平衡不会导致显著的效能损失。
Trials. 2017 Mar 7;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1832-8.
3
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.不同聚类大小对横向阶段-推移群组随机试验的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0760-6.
4
Power calculation for detecting interaction effect in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: an important tool for disparity research.横断面阶梯楔形整群随机试验中检测交互作用效应的功效计算:差异研究的重要工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02162-0.
5
Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.阶梯楔形整群随机试验中群大小不均衡:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017151.
6
Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.不均衡群组大小对二分类结局的分步楔形群组随机试验的广义估计方程分析的影响。
Biom J. 2022 Mar;64(3):419-439. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100112. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.利用广义估计方程对二分类结局的截面式分段-整群随机试验进行分析时的功效计算。
Stat Med. 2021 Dec 20;40(29):6674-6688. doi: 10.1002/sim.9205. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.序列均等分配的阶梯楔形试验的优化设计及其与其他试验设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2017 Dec;14(6):639-647. doi: 10.1177/1740774517723921. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
9
Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.群组随机对照试验的设计与分析:在加性风险混合模型下的生存时间结局。
Stat Med. 2022 Oct 30;41(24):4860-4885. doi: 10.1002/sim.9541. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Reconsidering stepped wedge cluster randomized trial designs with implementation periods: Fewer sequences or the parallel-group design with baseline and implementation periods are potentially more efficient.重新考虑具有实施阶段的阶梯型楔形集群随机试验设计:减少序列或具有基线和实施阶段的平行组设计可能更有效。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):710-722. doi: 10.1177/17407745241244790. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
PLUS-IS-LESS project: Procalcitonin and Lung UltraSonography-based antibiotherapy in patients with Lower rESpiratory tract infection in Swiss Emergency Departments: study protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial.PLUS-IS-LESS项目:瑞士急诊科下呼吸道感染患者基于降钙素原和肺部超声的抗生素治疗:一项实用阶梯式楔形整群随机试验的研究方案
Trials. 2024 Jan 25;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07795-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Highly efficient stepped wedge designs for clusters of unequal size.高效的不等大小群组的阶梯式楔形设计。
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1167-1176. doi: 10.1111/biom.13218. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.不同聚类大小对横向阶段-推移群组随机试验的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0760-6.
3
Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment.成批分步楔形设计:一种针对群组招募延迟稳健的设计。
Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3627-3641. doi: 10.1002/sim.9438. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials: A Methodological Overview.阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验:方法概述。
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.136.
5
Sample size considerations for stepped wedge designs with subclusters.具有亚群组的阶乘楔形设计的样本量考虑。
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):98-112. doi: 10.1111/biom.13596. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.不均衡群组大小对二分类结局的分步楔形群组随机试验的广义估计方程分析的影响。
Biom J. 2022 Mar;64(3):419-439. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100112. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.利用广义估计方程对二分类结局的截面式分段-整群随机试验进行分析时的功效计算。
Stat Med. 2021 Dec 20;40(29):6674-6688. doi: 10.1002/sim.9205. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
Methods for dealing with unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials: A scoping review.处理整群随机试验中不等群组大小的方法:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0255389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255389. eCollection 2021.
9
Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.混合效应模型在阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验设计和分析中的应用概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):612-639. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932962. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes.解释不等群组大小的阶段式楔形试验获得的功效的变异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 24;20(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01036-5.
纵向或横截面抽样下不等群集大小在阶梯楔形和其他试验设计中的相对效率。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 30;37(30):4652-4664. doi: 10.1002/sim.7943. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Sample size determination for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.阶梯楔形整群随机试验广义估计方程分析的样本量确定
Biometrics. 2018 Dec;74(4):1450-1458. doi: 10.1111/biom.12918. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.阶梯楔形整群随机试验中群大小不均衡:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017151.
6
An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.在具有连续结局的横断面、阶梯式整群随机试验中,整群大小的不平衡不会导致显著的效能损失。
Trials. 2017 Mar 7;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1832-8.
7
Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials.阶梯楔形及其他纵向整群随机试验的样本量计算
Stat Med. 2016 Nov 20;35(26):4718-4728. doi: 10.1002/sim.7028. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
8
Current issues in the design and analysis of stepped wedge trials.阶梯楔形试验设计与分析中的当前问题
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中样本量确定的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):1051-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv113. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
10
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting.阶梯楔形整群随机试验:原理、设计、分析与报告
BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391.