• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.考虑到右截断的计数结局的群组随机试验的样本量和功效。
Biom J. 2021 Jun;63(5):1052-1071. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000230. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
Power calculations for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) with right-truncated Poisson-distributed outcomes: a motivating example from a malaria vector control trial.具有右截断泊松分布结局的整群随机试验的功效计算:来自疟疾媒介控制试验的一个实例
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):954-962. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz277.
3
Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.群组随机对照试验的设计与分析:在加性风险混合模型下的生存时间结局。
Stat Med. 2022 Oct 30;41(24):4860-4885. doi: 10.1002/sim.9541. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
4
An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.在具有连续结局的横断面、阶梯式整群随机试验中,整群大小的不平衡不会导致显著的效能损失。
Trials. 2017 Mar 7;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1832-8.
5
Sample size requirements for testing treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.检验二分类结局的群组随机试验中处理效应异质性的样本量要求。
Stat Med. 2023 Nov 30;42(27):5054-5083. doi: 10.1002/sim.9901. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.利用广义估计方程对二分类结局的截面式分段-整群随机试验进行分析时的功效计算。
Stat Med. 2021 Dec 20;40(29):6674-6688. doi: 10.1002/sim.9205. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
7
Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.当各处理组间的组内相关系数不同时,二分类结局的群组随机试验的功效和样本量计算。
Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;19(1):42-51. doi: 10.1177/17407745211059845. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
8
Design and analysis of a 2-year parallel follow-up of repeated ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria: Small sample considerations for cluster-randomized trials with count data.重复使用伊维菌素进行大规模药物治疗以控制疟疾的 2 年平行随访的设计和分析:用于计数数据的群组随机试验的小样本考虑因素。
Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;18(5):582-593. doi: 10.1177/17407745211028581. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
9
Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials.四级整群随机试验广义估计方程分析的效能考量
Biom J. 2022 Apr;64(4):663-680. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100081. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
10
Sample size calculation for cluster randomized trials with zero-inflated count outcomes.群组随机试验中具有零膨胀计数结果的样本量计算。
Stat Med. 2022 May 30;41(12):2191-2204. doi: 10.1002/sim.9350. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing individually randomized group treatment trials with repeated outcome measurements using generalized estimating equations.采用广义估计方程设计具有重复结局测量的个体随机分组治疗试验。
Stat Med. 2024 Jan 30;43(2):358-378. doi: 10.1002/sim.9966. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Informative cluster size in cluster-randomised trials: A case study from the TRIGGER trial.信息聚类大小在整群随机临床试验中的应用:来自 TRIGGER 试验的案例研究。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):661-669. doi: 10.1177/17407745231186094. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster-randomized trials with a rare binary outcome.利用基线协变量分析罕见二分类结局的小型整群随机试验。
Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2200135. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200135. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
4
Improving sandwich variance estimation for marginal Cox analysis of cluster randomized trials.提高群组随机试验边缘 Cox 分析中夹层方差估计的方法。
Biom J. 2023 Mar;65(3):e2200113. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200113. Epub 2022 Dec 25.
5
Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.群组随机对照试验的设计与分析:在加性风险混合模型下的生存时间结局。
Stat Med. 2022 Oct 30;41(24):4860-4885. doi: 10.1002/sim.9541. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
6
Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.在整群随机临床试验中的估算指标:选择回答正确问题的分析方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):107-118. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac131.
7
Accounting for unequal cluster sizes in designing cluster randomized trials to detect treatment effect heterogeneity.在设计用于检测治疗效果异质性的整群随机试验时,考虑不等的群组大小。
Stat Med. 2022 Apr 15;41(8):1376-1396. doi: 10.1002/sim.9283. Epub 2021 Dec 19.
8
Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials.四级整群随机试验广义估计方程分析的效能考量
Biom J. 2022 Apr;64(4):663-680. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100081. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
9
Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.不均衡群组大小对二分类结局的分步楔形群组随机试验的广义估计方程分析的影响。
Biom J. 2022 Mar;64(3):419-439. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100112. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
xtgeebcv: A command for bias-corrected sandwich variance estimation for GEE analyses of cluster randomized trials.xtgeebcv:用于集群随机试验的广义估计方程(GEE)分析中偏差校正三明治方差估计的命令。
Stata J. 2020 Jun;20(2):363-381. doi: 10.1177/1536867x20931001. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.混合效应模型在阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验设计和分析中的应用概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):612-639. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932962. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Maintaining the validity of inference in small-sample stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when using generalized estimating equations.在使用广义估计方程时,保持二元结局的小样本阶梯楔形整群随机试验中推断的有效性。
Stat Med. 2020 Sep 20;39(21):2779-2792. doi: 10.1002/sim.8575. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Commentary: Right truncation in cluster randomized trials can attenuate the power of a marginal analysis.评论:整群随机试验中的右侧截尾可能会削弱边际分析的功效。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):964-967. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa037.
5
Power calculations for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) with right-truncated Poisson-distributed outcomes: a motivating example from a malaria vector control trial.具有右截断泊松分布结局的整群随机试验的功效计算:来自疟疾媒介控制试验的一个实例
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):954-962. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz277.
6
Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.具有衰减相关结构的队列逐步楔形整群随机试验的设计与分析考量
Stat Med. 2020 Feb 20;39(4):438-455. doi: 10.1002/sim.8415. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Sample Size Calculation for Count Outcomes in Cluster Randomization Trials with Varying Cluster Sizes.聚类大小不同的整群随机试验中计数结局的样本量计算
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2020;49(1):116-124. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2018.1532004. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Sample size calculation for clinical trials with correlated count measurements based on the negative binomial distribution.基于负二项分布的具有相关计数测量值的临床试验样本量计算。
Stat Med. 2019 Dec 10;38(28):5413-5427. doi: 10.1002/sim.8378. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
9
Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.在协变量相关缺失下缺失二分类结局的群组随机试验中,加权作为多水平多重插补替代方法的性质和陷阱。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 May;29(5):1338-1353. doi: 10.1177/0962280219859915. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
10
Efficacy and risk of harms of repeat ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria (RIMDAMAL): a cluster-randomised trial.重复使用伊维菌素大规模药物治疗控制疟疾的效果和危害(RIMDAMAL):一项基于群组的随机试验。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1517-1526. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32321-3. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

考虑到右截断的计数结局的群组随机试验的样本量和功效。

Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Biom J. 2021 Jun;63(5):1052-1071. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000230. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.202000230
PMID:33751620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9132617/
Abstract

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are widely used in epidemiological and public health studies assessing population-level effect of group-based interventions. One important application of CRTs is the control of vector-borne disease, such as malaria. However, a particular challenge for designing these trials is that the primary outcome involves counts of episodes that are subject to right truncation. While sample size formulas have been developed for CRTs with clustered counts, they are not directly applicable when the counts are right truncated. To address this limitation, we discuss two marginal modeling approaches for the analysis of CRTs with truncated counts and develop two corresponding closed-form sample size formulas to facilitate the design of such trials. The proposed sample size formulas allow investigators to explore the power under a large number of scenarios without computationally intensive simulations. The proposed formulas are validated in extensive simulations. We further explore the implication of right truncation on power and apply the proposed formulas to illustrate the power calculation for a malaria control CRT where the primary outcome is subject to right truncation.

摘要

集群随机试验(CRTs)广泛应用于评估基于群体干预的人群水平效果的流行病学和公共卫生研究中。CRTs 的一个重要应用是控制虫媒疾病,例如疟疾。然而,设计这些试验的一个特殊挑战是,主要结局涉及到受右截断的发作次数的计数。虽然已经为具有聚类计数的 CRTs 开发了样本量公式,但当计数受到右截断时,它们并不直接适用。为了解决这个限制,我们讨论了两种用于分析截断计数 CRT 的边缘建模方法,并开发了两个相应的闭式样本量公式,以方便此类试验的设计。所提出的样本量公式允许研究人员在不进行计算密集型模拟的情况下探索大量场景下的功效。所提出的公式在广泛的模拟中得到了验证。我们进一步探讨了右截断对功效的影响,并应用所提出的公式来说明主要结局受到右截断的疟疾控制 CRT 的功效计算。