Roth M G, Doyle C, Sambrook J, Gething M J
J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1271-83. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1271.
Chimeric genes were created by fusing DNA sequences encoding the ectodomain of the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) to DNA coding for the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of either the G glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus or the gC glycoprotein of Herpes simplex virus 1. CV-1 cells infected with SV40 vectors carrying the recombinant genes expressed large amounts of the chimeric proteins, HAG or HAgC on their surfaces. Although the ectodomains of HAG and HAgC differed in their immunological properties from that of HA, the chimeras displayed the biological functions characteristic of the wild-type protein. Both HAG and HAgC bound erythrocytes as efficiently as HA did and, after brief exposure to an acidic environment, induced the fusion of erythrocyte and CV-1 cell membranes. However, the behavior of HAG and HAgC at the cell surface differed from that of HA in several important respects. HAG and HAgC were observed to collect in coated pits whereas wild-type HA was excluded from those structures. In the presence of chloroquine, which inhibits the exit of receptors from endosomes, HAG and HAgC accumulated in intracellular vesicles. By contrast, chloroquine had no effect on the location of wild-type HA. HAG and HAgC labeled at the cell surface exhibited a temperature-dependent acquisition of resistance to extracellular protease at a rate similar to the rates of internalization observed for many cell surface receptors. HA acquired resistance to protease at a rate at least 20-fold slower. We conclude that HAG and HAgC are efficiently routed into the endocytic pathway and HA is not. However, like HA, HAG was degraded slowly, raising the possibility that HAG recycles to the plasma membrane.
嵌合基因是通过将编码流感病毒血凝素(HA)胞外结构域的DNA序列与编码水疱性口炎病毒G糖蛋白或单纯疱疹病毒1 gC糖蛋白的跨膜和胞质结构域的DNA融合而产生的。用携带重组基因的SV40载体感染的CV-1细胞在其表面表达大量的嵌合蛋白HAG或HAgC。尽管HAG和HAgC的胞外结构域在免疫特性上与HA不同,但这些嵌合体表现出野生型蛋白的生物学功能。HAG和HAgC与红细胞结合的效率与HA相同,并且在短暂暴露于酸性环境后,诱导红细胞和CV-1细胞膜融合。然而,HAG和HAgC在细胞表面的行为在几个重要方面与HA不同。观察到HAG和HAgC聚集在被膜小窝中,而野生型HA被排除在这些结构之外。在存在抑制受体从内体排出的氯喹的情况下,HAG和HAgC在内含泡中积累。相比之下,氯喹对野生型HA的定位没有影响。在细胞表面标记的HAG和HAgC表现出对细胞外蛋白酶的温度依赖性抗性获得,其速率与许多细胞表面受体观察到的内化速率相似。HA获得蛋白酶抗性的速率至少慢20倍。我们得出结论,HAG和HAgC有效地进入内吞途径,而HA则不然。然而,与HA一样,HAG降解缓慢,这增加了HAG循环回到质膜的可能性。