Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 May;25(5):607-612. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) account for 1.5% of diarrhoeic episodes in patients attending a general practitioner in the Netherlands, but its sources are unknown. We searched for community clusters to recognize localized point sources of CDI.
Between October 2010 and February 2012, a community-based prospective nested case-control study was performed in three laboratories in the Netherlands with a study population of 2 810 830 people. Bernoulli spatial scan and space-time permutation models were used to detect spatial and/or temporal clusters of CDI. In addition, a multivariate conditional logistic regression model was constructed to test livestock exposure as a supposed risk factor in CDI patients without hospital admission within the previous 12 weeks (community-acquired (CA) CDI).
In laboratories A, B and C, 1.3%, 1.8% and 2.1% of patients with diarrhoea tested positive for CDI, respectively. The mean age of CA-CDI patients (n = 124) was 49 years (standard deviation, 22.6); 64.5% were female. No spatial or temporal clusters of CDI cases were detected compared to C. difficile-negative diarrhoeic controls. Except for one false-positive signal, no spatiotemporal interaction amongst CDI cases was found. Livestock exposure was not related to CA-CDI (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-2.24). Ten percent of CA-CDIs was caused by PCR ribotype 078, spatially dispersed throughout the study area.
The absence of clusters of CDI cases in a community cohort of diarrhoeic patients suggests a lack of localized point sources of CDI in the living environment of these patients.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)占荷兰全科医生就诊患者腹泻发作的 1.5%,但其来源尚不清楚。我们寻找社区聚集,以识别 CDI 的局部点状来源。
2010 年 10 月至 2012 年 2 月,在荷兰的三个实验室进行了一项基于社区的前瞻性巢式病例对照研究,研究人群为 2810830 人。使用 Bernoulli 空间扫描和时空置换模型来检测 CDI 的空间和/或时间聚集。此外,构建了一个多变量条件逻辑回归模型,以检验在过去 12 周内无住院史的 CDI 患者(社区获得性(CA)CDI)的家畜接触情况作为假定的危险因素。
在实验室 A、B 和 C,分别有 1.3%、1.8%和 2.1%的腹泻患者 CDI 检测呈阳性。CA-CDI 患者(n=124)的平均年龄为 49 岁(标准差为 22.6);64.5%为女性。与 C. difficile 阴性腹泻对照相比,未检测到 CDI 病例的空间或时间聚集。除了一个假阳性信号外,未发现 CDI 病例之间存在时空相互作用。家畜接触与 CA-CDI 无关(比值比,0.99;95%置信区间,0.44-2.24)。10%的 CA-CDIs 由空间分布在整个研究区域的 PCR 核糖型 078 引起。
在社区腹泻患者队列中未发现 CDI 病例聚集,表明这些患者生活环境中缺乏局部点状 CDI 来源。