Suppr超能文献

瓦努阿图农村地区的多水源利用:家庭是否选择了最安全的饮用水?

Multiple water source use in rural Vanuatu: are households choosing the safest option for drinking?

机构信息

a Institute for Sustainable Futures , University of Technology Sydney , Ultimo , Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Health Res. 2018 Dec;28(6):579-589. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1491953. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

Abstract

Households in low- and middle-income countries commonly make use of multiple water sources. However, it remains unclear to what extent their drinking water choices are optimal from a health perspective. This matched cohort study across 10 islands in Vanuatu examined communities with both a groundwater and rainwater source to determine whether their preferred drinking option was the safest in microbial terms. In communities that preferred to drink rainwater, 56.5% of rainwater sources had 'high-risk' or 'very high risk' Escherichia coli contamination (> 10 MPN/100 mL) compared with 26.1% of groundwater sources (p = 0.092). Moreover, a preference for drinking rainwater was significantly associated with rainwater sources having 'high-risk' or 'very high risk' levels of E. coli contamination (p = 0.045). Results show that communities do not necessarily choose the safest water source for drinking. Findings also highlight the need to bolster local capacity to manage water quality risks and for Sustainable Development Goal monitoring to distinguish between protected and unprotected rainwater tanks.

摘要

低收入和中等收入国家的家庭通常会利用多种水源。然而,从健康角度来看,他们的饮用水选择在多大程度上是最优的,这一点尚不清楚。这项在瓦努阿图的 10 个岛屿上进行的匹配队列研究调查了同时拥有地下水和雨水水源的社区,以确定他们首选的饮用水在微生物方面是否是最安全的。在更喜欢饮用雨水的社区中,有 56.5%的雨水水源受到大肠杆菌污染(> 10 MPN/100 mL),被认为具有“高风险”或“极高风险”,而地下水水源的这一比例为 26.1%(p = 0.092)。此外,更喜欢饮用雨水与雨水水源具有“高风险”或“极高风险”大肠杆菌污染水平显著相关(p = 0.045)。研究结果表明,社区并不一定会选择最安全的饮用水源。研究结果还强调,需要加强当地管理水质风险的能力,并需要进行可持续发展目标监测,以区分受保护和未受保护的雨水箱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验