• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期投资:评估幼儿项目的成果与经济回报

Investing Early: Taking Stock of Outcomes and Economic Returns from Early Childhood Programs.

作者信息

Cannon Jill S, Kilburn M Rebecca, Karoly Lynn A, Mattox Teryn, Muchow Ashley N, Buenaventura Maya

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2018 Mar 30;7(4):6. eCollection 2018 Mar.

PMID:30083418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6075808/
Abstract

The past two decades have been characterized by a growing body of research from diverse disciplines-child development, psychology, neuroscience, and economics, among others-demonstrating the importance of establishing a strong foundation in the early years of life. The research evidence has served to document the range of early childhood services that can successfully put children and families on the path toward lifelong health and well-being, especially those at greatest risk of poor outcomes. As early childhood interventions have proliferated, researchers have evaluated whether the programs improve children's outcomes and, when they do, whether the improved outcomes generate benefits that can outweigh the program costs. This study examines a set of evaluations that meet criteria for scientific rigor and synthesizes their results to better understand the outcomes, costs, and benefits of early childhood programs. The authors focus on evaluations of 115 early childhood programs serving children or parents of children from the prenatal period to age 5. Although preschool is perhaps the best-known early childhood intervention, the study also reviewed such programs as home visiting, parent education, government transfers providing cash and in-kind benefits, and those that use a combination of approaches. The findings demonstrate that most of the reviewed programs have favorable effects on at least one child outcome and those with an economic evaluation tend to show positive economic returns. With this expanded evidence base, policymakers can be highly confident that well-designed and -implemented early childhood programs can improve the lives of children and their families.

摘要

在过去二十年中,来自儿童发展、心理学、神经科学和经济学等不同学科的研究越来越多,这些研究表明在生命早期建立坚实基础的重要性。研究证据记录了一系列早期儿童服务,这些服务能够成功地让儿童和家庭走上终身健康和幸福的道路,尤其是那些面临不良后果风险最大的儿童和家庭。随着早期儿童干预措施的激增,研究人员评估了这些项目是否能改善儿童的成果,以及当它们确实产生改善效果时,这些改善的成果所带来的好处是否能超过项目成本。本研究考察了一组符合科学严谨性标准的评估,并综合其结果以更好地理解早期儿童项目的成果、成本和效益。作者重点关注了115个早期儿童项目的评估,这些项目服务于从孕期到5岁儿童及其父母。尽管学前教育可能是最广为人知的早期儿童干预措施,但该研究还审查了诸如家访、家长教育、提供现金和实物福利的政府转移支付以及采用多种方法结合的项目。研究结果表明,大多数被审查的项目对至少一项儿童成果有积极影响,而那些进行了经济评估的项目往往显示出正的经济回报。有了这一扩大的证据基础,政策制定者可以非常有信心地认为,精心设计和实施的早期儿童项目能够改善儿童及其家庭的生活。

相似文献

1
Investing Early: Taking Stock of Outcomes and Economic Returns from Early Childhood Programs.早期投资:评估幼儿项目的成果与经济回报
Rand Health Q. 2018 Mar 30;7(4):6. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Cash Transfers and Child and Adolescent Development现金转移与儿童及青少年发展
3
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
4
Evidence of Impact of Interventions on Growth and Development during Early and Middle Childhood早期和中期儿童干预对生长发育影响的证据
5
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
6
EHLS at School: school-age follow-up of the Early Home Learning Study cluster randomized controlled trial.EHLS 在学校:早期家庭学习研究群组随机对照试验的学龄期随访。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 May 2;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1122-y.
7
Enhancing the early home learning environment through a brief group parenting intervention: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.通过简短的小组育儿干预增强早期家庭学习环境:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Jun 2;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0610-1.
8
Home Visiting Programs: What the Primary Care Clinician Should Know.家访计划:初级保健临床医生应了解的内容。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2016 Apr;46(4):101-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.12.011. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
9
Identifying an Essential Package for Early Child Development: Economic Analysis确定幼儿早期发展的核心要素包:经济分析
10
Home Visiting: A Service Strategy to Reduce Poverty and Mitigate Its Consequences.家访:一项减少贫困及其影响的服务策略。
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.005.

引用本文的文献

1
The State of Healthy Parenting in Primary Care Interventions in Advancing Health Equity.初级保健干预中促进健康公平的健康养育状况。
NAM Perspect. 2025 Mar 24;2025. doi: 10.31478/202503a. eCollection 2025.
2
Turn-over and Retention Among Head Start Educators.“启智计划”教育工作者的人员流动与留任情况
Early Child Educ J. 2025 Jun;53(5):1467-1478. doi: 10.1007/s10643-024-01685-x. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Site and Provider Characteristics Associated with the Use of Exclusionary Discipline in Minnesota Early Care and Education Sites.明尼苏达州早期护理与教育场所中与使用排他性纪律相关的场所及提供者特征
Early Educ Dev. 2025;36(1):129-144. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2024.2360880. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
Criminal Legal System Experiences Among Families Receiving Home Visiting Services: A Scoping Review of the Literature.接受家访服务家庭的刑事法律系统经历:文献综述
Prev Sci. 2025 Apr;26(3):404-425. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01798-8. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
5
State-Level Spending on Children Associated with Unequal Benefits to School Readiness.州级儿童支出与入学准备方面的不平等收益相关。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Apr;29(4):494-503. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04068-9. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
6
Structural inequality modifies midlife outcomes of a multisystemic early childhood program.结构性不平等改变了多系统幼儿早期干预计划的中年结果。
Fam Syst Health. 2024 Sep;42(3):417-426. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000895.
7
Structural Equality and Support Index in Early Childhood Education.结构平等与儿童早期教育支持指数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2432050. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32050.
8
Top Alzheimer's disease risk allele frequencies differ in HABS-HD Mexican- versus Non-Hispanic White Americans.阿尔茨海默病最高风险等位基因频率在西班牙裔美国人和非西班牙裔美国白人之间存在差异。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Dec 27;15(4):e12518. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12518. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
9
Measuring the cost-effectiveness of a home-visiting intervention to promote early child development among rural families linked to the Rwandan social protection system.衡量一项家访干预措施在与卢旺达社会保护系统相关的农村家庭中促进儿童早期发展的成本效益。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;3(10):e0002473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002473. eCollection 2023.
10
Access to Early Care and Education in Rural Communities: Implications for Children's School Readiness.农村社区的早期护理与教育机会:对儿童入学准备的影响
RSF. 2022 May 1;8(3):100-123. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2022.8.3.04. Epub 2022 May 12.