From the Department of Radiology, CHU Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France (N.B.); Lyon 1 University, Villeurbanne, France (N.B., B.C.); Department of Emergency Medicine, CH Saint-Joseph Saint-Luc, Lyon, France (B.C.); Imadis Teleradiology, Lyon, France (N.B., F.B., J.F.B., V.T.); and Department of Radiology, CHU Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 191 Ave du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier, France (I.M.).
Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):374-383. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180492. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
Purpose To determine radiologic and clinical markers predictive of missed injuries at early whole-body CT image interpretation. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, 2354 consecutive whole-body CT examinations were performed in patients with multiple traumas from 26 hospitals interpreted at a teleradiology center study during on-call period from February 2011 to September 2016. All whole-body CT images were interpreted by the on-call radiologist and reviewed within 12-48 hours by another radiologist to detect missed injury as the standard of reference. The first and review reports of all examinations were retrospectively reviewed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression with a stepwise selection method were performed to identify clinical and radiologic predictors of missed injury. Results This study included 639 women (27.1%) and 1715 men (72.8%). The median age of men, women, and the entire population was 34 years (age range, 1-96 years). On a per-scan basis, there were 304 (12.9%) missed injuries and 59 (2.5%) were clinically significant. On a per-injury basis, the missed injury rate was 530 of 5979 (8.8%). More than two injured body parts (odds ratio, 1.4 [95% confidence interval: 1.1, 1.8]; P = .01), patient age older than 30 years (odds ratio, 2.8 [95% confidence interval: 2.1, 3.8]; P < .001), and an initial clinical severity class of 1 (odds ratio, 1.9 [95% confidence interval: 1.3, 2.8]; P < .001) were independent predictive factors of missed injury. Conclusion Multiple traumas with more than two injured body parts, age older than 30 years, or an initial clinical severity class of 1 were associated with missed injury at whole-body CT. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Novelline in this issue.
目的 旨在确定全身 CT 早期影像解读时预测漏诊损伤的影像学和临床标志物。
材料与方法 本回顾性研究纳入了 2011 年 2 月至 2016 年 9 月期间在一家远程放射学中心进行的 26 家医院的 2354 例多发伤患者的连续全身 CT 检查,这些患者在值班期间由放射科医生进行了全身 CT 检查,并在 12-48 小时内由另一名放射科医生进行了复查,以检测漏诊损伤作为参考标准。回顾性分析所有检查的初次报告和复查报告。采用逐步选择法对单变量和多变量逻辑回归进行分析,以确定漏诊损伤的临床和影像学预测因素。
结果 本研究共纳入 639 例女性(27.1%)和 1715 例男性(72.8%)。男性、女性和整个人群的中位年龄为 34 岁(年龄范围:1-96 岁)。以单次扫描为基础,有 304 例(12.9%)漏诊损伤,其中 59 例(2.5%)为临床显著损伤。以单次损伤为基础,漏诊损伤率为 5979 例中的 530 例(8.8%)。两个以上受伤身体部位(比值比,1.4 [95%置信区间:1.1,1.8];P =.01)、年龄大于 30 岁(比值比,2.8 [95%置信区间:2.1,3.8];P <.001)和初始临床严重程度等级为 1(比值比,1.9 [95%置信区间:1.3,2.8];P <.001)是漏诊的独立预测因素。
结论 全身 CT 检查时,多发伤患者有两个以上受伤身体部位、年龄大于 30 岁或初始临床严重程度等级为 1 与漏诊损伤相关。
© RSNA,2018 在线补充材料可在本文中获取。另见本期社论。