MS, Doctoral Student, Division of Family Health Care Nursing, Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, Japan.
PhD, RN, CTN-A, Lecturer, Division of Family Health Care Nursing, Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, Japan.
J Nurs Res. 2019 Apr;27(2):e12. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000278.
The older adult population is increasing in number, and elder abuse is expected to become a more pressing problem. Developing tools to assess the presence and severity of elder abuse is important to both effectively prevent this abuse and provide increased support for families.
This study was intended to test the validity of an Assessment Tool for Domestic Elder Abuse (ATDEA). The items that constitute this tool were derived from a literature review.
Two rounds of self-administered questionnaire surveys were conducted with nurses working at home-visit nursing stations. Round 1 was used to evaluate the face validity, and Round 2 was used to test the content using the content validity index (CVI).
Two hundred forty nurses participated in the two studies. In Round 1, 56 nurses evaluated 38 items derived from a literature review, resulting in the development of a 36-item ATDEA. In Round 2, 184 nurses evaluated the content validity of the 36-item ATDEA. The Item-CVI (I-CVI) scores ranged from .61 to 1. Twenty-eight of the items met or exceeded the I-CVI threshold of .78, whereas the eight items assessing self-neglect did not. The overall Scale-CVI score for the assessment tool was .90, which met the threshold of .90.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of validity testing established the preliminary validity of this assessment tool. In addition, as self-neglect is known to damage the well-being of older adults, six of the eight items assessing self-neglect were retained in the ATDEA despite their failure to meet the threshold I-CVI of .78. The remaining two self-neglect items were not included in the ATDEA because of excessively low I-CVI scores (< .70). Thus, the final version of the ATDEA includes 34 items. The authors recommend that nursing professionals use the ATDEA as a checklist to assess the presence of elder abuse and to discern the subtypes and severity of this abuse. When evaluating elder abuse, the higher the degree of severity, the greater the urgency to provide support.
老年人口数量不断增加,预计虐待老年人的问题将更加紧迫。开发评估老年人虐待的工具对于有效预防这种虐待和为家庭提供更多支持都非常重要。
本研究旨在测试家庭老年人虐待评估工具(ATDEA)的有效性。该工具的项目来源于文献综述。
对在家庭访视护理站工作的护士进行了两轮自我管理的问卷调查。第一轮用于评估表面有效性,第二轮使用内容有效性指数(CVI)测试内容。
共有 240 名护士参与了这两项研究。在第一轮中,56 名护士评估了从文献综述中得出的 38 个项目,从而制定了 36 项 ATDEA。在第二轮中,184 名护士评估了 36 项 ATDEA 的内容有效性。项目-CVI(I-CVI)评分范围为 0.61 至 1。28 项评估自我忽视的项目达到或超过 0.78 的 I-CVI 阈值,而 8 项评估自我忽视的项目则未达到。评估工具的整体量表-CVI 得分为 0.90,达到 0.90 的阈值。
结论/对实践的影响:有效性测试的结果初步验证了该评估工具的有效性。此外,由于自我忽视已知会损害老年人的福祉,因此尽管八项评估自我忽视的项目中的六项未达到 0.78 的 I-CVI 阈值,但仍保留在 ATDEA 中。ATDEA 中不再包含另外两项自我忽视的项目,因为它们的 I-CVI 得分过低(<0.70)。因此,ATDEA 的最终版本包括 34 个项目。作者建议护理专业人员将 ATDEA 用作检查表,以评估老年人虐待的存在,并辨别这种虐待的亚型和严重程度。在评估老年人虐待时,严重程度越高,提供支持的紧迫性就越大。